10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Impact of low light intensity on biomass partitioning and genetic diversity in a chickpea mapping population

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          With recent climatic changes, the reduced access to solar radiation has become an emerging threat to chickpeas’ drought tolerance capacity under rainfed conditions. This study was conducted to assess, and understand the effects of reduced light intensity and quality on plant morphology, root development, and identifying resistant sources from a Sonali/PBA Slasher mapping population. We evaluated 180 genotypes, including recombinant inbred lines (RILs), parents, and commercial checks, using a split-block design with natural and low light treatments. Low light conditions, created by covering one of the two benches inside two growth chambers with a mosquito net, reduced natural light availability by approximately 70%. Light measurements encompassed photosynthetic photon flux density, as well as red, and far-red light readings taken at various stages of the experiment. The data, collected from plumule emergence to anthesis initiation, encompassed various indices relevant to root, shoot, and carbon gain (biomass). Statistical analysis examined variance, treatment effects, heritability, correlations, and principal components (PCs). Results demonstrated significant reductions in root biomass, shoot biomass, root/shoot ratio, and plant total dry biomass under suboptimal light conditions by 52.8%, 28.2%, 36.3%, and 38.4%, respectively. Plants also exhibited delayed progress, taking 9.2% longer to produce their first floral buds, and 19.2% longer to commence anthesis, accompanied by a 33.4% increase in internodal lengths. A significant genotype-by-environment interaction highlighted differing genotypic responses, particularly in traits with high heritability (> 77.0%), such as days to anthesis, days to first floral bud, plant height, and nodes per plant. These traits showed significant associations with drought tolerance indicators, like root, shoot, and plant total dry biomass. Genetic diversity, as depicted in a genotype-by-trait biplot, revealed contributions to PC1 and PC2 coefficients, allowing discrimination of low-light-tolerant RILs, such as 1_52, 1_73, 1_64, 1_245, 1_103, 1_248, and 1_269, with valuable variations in traits of interest. These RILs could be used to breed desirable chickpea cultivars for sustainable production under water-limited conditions. This study concludes that low light stress disrupts the balance between root and shoot morphology, diverting photosynthates to vegetative structures at the expense of root development. Our findings contribute to a better understanding of biomass partitioning under limited-light conditions, and inform breeding strategies for improved drought tolerance in chickpeas.

          Related collections

          Most cited references121

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis

          For the past twenty five years the NIH family of imaging software, NIH Image and ImageJ have been pioneers as open tools for scientific image analysis. We discuss the origins, challenges and solutions of these two programs, and how their history can serve to advise and inform other software projects.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Ethylene regulates root growth through effects on auxin biosynthesis and transport-dependent auxin distribution.

            In plants, each developmental process integrates a network of signaling events that are regulated by different phytohormones, and interactions among hormonal pathways are essential to modulate their effect. Continuous growth of roots results from the postembryonic activity of cells within the root meristem that is controlled by the coordinated action of several phytohormones, including auxin and ethylene. Although their interaction has been studied intensively, the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying this interplay are unknown. We show that the effect of ethylene on root growth is largely mediated by the regulation of the auxin biosynthesis and transport-dependent local auxin distribution. Ethylene stimulates auxin biosynthesis and basipetal auxin transport toward the elongation zone, where it activates a local auxin response leading to inhibition of cell elongation. Consistently, in mutants affected in auxin perception or basipetal auxin transport, ethylene cannot activate the auxin response nor regulate the root growth. In addition, ethylene modulates the transcription of several components of the auxin transport machinery. Thus, ethylene achieves a local activation of the auxin signaling pathway and regulates root growth by both stimulating the auxin biosynthesis and by modulating the auxin transport machinery.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Estimates of Genetic and Environmental Variability in Soybeans1

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/321900Role: Role: Role: Role:
                Role: Role:
                Role: Role: Role:
                Journal
                Front Plant Sci
                Front Plant Sci
                Front. Plant Sci.
                Frontiers in Plant Science
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-462X
                01 February 2024
                2024
                : 15
                : 1292753
                Affiliations
                [1] 1 Centre for Carbon, Water and Food, The University of Sydney , NSW, Australia
                [2] 2 School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney , NSW, Australia
                [3] 3 Sydney Institute of Agriculture, The University of Sydney , NSW, Australia
                [4] 4 Plant Breeding Institute, Cobbitty, The University of Sydney , NSW, Australia
                Author notes

                Edited by: Xiuming Hao, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC), Canada

                Reviewed by: Antonio Pompeiano, Mendel University in Brno, Czechia

                Jamal Y Ayad, The University of Jordan, Jordan

                *Correspondence: Muhammad Naveed, naveed1735@ 123456yahoo.com
                Article
                10.3389/fpls.2024.1292753
                10867217
                38362449
                7c8d34be-a3e7-4ba4-bb4a-fd9a69034439
                Copyright © 2024 Naveed, Bansal and Kaiser

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 12 September 2023
                : 15 January 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 121, Pages: 15, Words: 8663
                Funding
                The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This study was funded by the ARC Industrial Transformation Research Hub - Legumes for Sustainable Agriculture (IH140100013) and the Grains Research and Development Corporation (GRDC), Australia.
                Categories
                Plant Science
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                Crop and Product Physiology

                Plant science & Botany
                abiotic stress,biomass partitioning,chickpea,genetic diversity,low light,mapping population,phenological plasticity

                Comments

                Comment on this article