19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Current status of implementation of trauma registries’ in LMICs & facilitators to implementation barriers: A literature review & consultation

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background & objectives

          Many low- and middle- income countries (LMICs) have attempted to implement trauma registries with varying degrees of success. This study aimed to understand the registry implementation mechanism in LMICs better. Study objectives include assessment of the current use of trauma registries in LMICs, identification of barriers to the process and potential areas for intervention, and investigation of the registry implementation experience of key stakeholders in LMICs.

          Methods

          An initial narrative review of articles on trauma registry use in LMICs published in English between January 2017 and September 2023 was conducted. Key findings identified in this review were used to establish a theoretical framework from which an interview guide was subsequently developed. Expert consultation with key stakeholders in trauma registry implementation in two LMICs was conducted to assess the experience of registry implementation further.

          Results

          The presence of trauma registries in LMICs is limited. Key implementation barriers include funding concerns, uncoordinated administrative efforts, lack of human and physical resources (i.e., technology, equipment), and challenges in data management, analysis, and quality. Stakeholder interviews highlighted the importance of trauma registry development but echoed some obstacles, notably funding and data collection barriers.

          Interpretation & conclusions

          Barriers to registry implementation are ubiquitous and may contribute to the low uptake of registries in LMICs. One potential solution to these challenges is the application of the WHO International Registry for Trauma and Emergency Care. Future studies examining context-specific challenges to registry implementation and sustained utilization are required.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Impact of Trauma Care Systems in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

          Injury is a leading cause of death globally, and organized trauma care systems have been shown to save lives. However, even though most injuries occur in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), most trauma care research comes from high-income countries where systems have been implemented with few resource constraints. Little context-relevant guidance exists to help policy makers set priorities in LMICs, where resources are limited and where trauma care may be implemented in distinct ways. We have aimed to review the evidence on the impact of trauma care systems in LMICs through a systematic search of 11 databases. Reports were categorized by intervention and outcome type and summarized. Of 4,284 records retrieved, 71 reports from 32 countries met inclusion criteria. Training, prehospital systems, and overall system organization were the most commonly reported interventions. Quality-improvement, costing, rehabilitation, and legislation and governance were relatively neglected areas. Included reports may inform trauma care system planning in LMICs, and noted gaps may guide research and funding agendas.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The value of trauma registries.

            Trauma registries are databases that document acute care delivered to patients hospitalised with injuries. They are designed to provide information that can be used to improve the efficiency and quality of trauma care. Indeed, the combination of trauma registry data at regional or national levels can produce very large databases that allow unprecedented opportunities for the evaluation of patient outcomes and inter-hospital comparisons. However, the creation and upkeep of trauma registries requires a substantial investment of money, time and effort, data quality is an important challenge and aggregated trauma data sets rarely represent a population-based sample of trauma. In addition, trauma hospitalisations are already routinely documented in administrative hospital discharge databases. The present review aims to provide evidence that trauma registry data can be used to improve the care dispensed to victims of injury in ways that could not be achieved with information from administrative databases alone. In addition, we will define the structure and purpose of contemporary trauma registries, acknowledge their limitations, and discuss possible ways to make them more useful.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The trauma registry as a statewide quality improvement tool.

              Trauma registries have been developed to describe the pattern of trauma and trauma workload, provide data for research, and to demonstrate changes in patient outcomes. Quality improvement using trauma registries at a system-wide level has been difficult to achieve. In Victoria, Australia, a statewide trauma system and trauma registry has been established to monitor and feedback the process of management and outcomes of major trauma patients across all healthcare providers. The development and implementation of the Victorian State Trauma Registry (VSTR), including its role as a quality monitoring tool and results from the first 2 years of operation, are provided. More than 80% of major trauma patients are being managed at major trauma services and standardized death rates are comparable with international standards. Quality indicators identify some areas for improvement. VSTR data indicate that the statewide trauma system is working well and provides a method for ongoing monitoring and trauma care feedback.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Indian J Med Res
                Indian J Med Res
                IJMR
                The Indian Journal of Medical Research
                Scientific Scholar
                0971-5916
                19 July 2024
                Mar-Apr 2024
                : 159
                : 3-4
                : 322-330
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston, Massachusetts, USA
                [2 ]Programme in Global Surgery and Social Change, Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts, USA
                [3 ]Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital , Boston, Massachusetts, USA
                [4 ]Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health , Boston, Massachusetts, USA
                [5 ]Department of Public Health, Tata Institute of Social Sciences , Mumbai, India
                [6 ]Seth Gordhandas Sunderdas Medical College and King Edward Memorial Hospital , Mumbai, India
                [7 ]Health Services Academy, Ministry of National Health Services Regulations & Coordination , Islamabad, Pakistan
                [8 ]Department of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Roosevelt Hospital , Guatemala City, Guatemala
                Author notes
                For correspondence: Dr Maria P. Cote, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02446, USA e-mail: mcote8@ 123456mgh.harvard.edu
                Article
                10.25259/IJMR_2420_23
                10.25259/IJMR_2420_23
                11413881
                39361796
                78cc8052-05e3-407a-bcb7-29befc43353b
                © 2024 Indian Journal of Medical Research, published by Scientific Scholar for Director-General, Indian Council of Medical Research

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

                History
                : 12 March 2024
                Categories
                Original Article

                Medicine
                implementation,injury surveillance,lmic–low- and middle- income countries,trauma,trauma systems

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content247

                Most referenced authors256