29
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Selection of the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) for subcutaneous nemvaleukin alfa: ARTISTRY-2.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          2552

          Background: Nemvaleukin alfa (nemvaleukin, ALKS 4230) is a novel engineered cytokine that selectively binds the intermediate-affinity interleukin-2 receptor to preferentially activate CD8 + T and natural killer (NK) cells with minimal expansion of regulatory T cells (T regs), designed for use as a cancer immunotherapy. ARTISTRY-2 (NCT03861793) is an ongoing phase 1/2 study evaluating the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PD) responses of subcutaneous (SC) nemvaleukin in combination with pembrolizumab in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors. Methods: In phase 1, cohort-specific doses of SC nemvaleukin are administered on an every-7-day (q7d) or every-21-day (q21d) schedule during a 6-week monotherapy lead-in period, followed by combination with pembrolizumab 200 mg q21d. We present safety, PD effects, and preliminary clinical activity outcomes as of 12/02/2020. Results: 57 pts received nemvaleukin doses ranging from 0.3 mg to 6 mg q7d or 1 mg to 10 mg q21d. The most frequent tumor types (> 5 pts) were colorectal, pancreatic, ovarian, and lung; median number of prior therapies was 4. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) in > 30% pts overall were pyrexia (43.9%), chills (38.6%), injection site erythema (33.3%), injection site reaction (33.3%), and fatigue (31.6%). 3 mg q7d (n = 7) had no drug-related dose reductions, discontinuations, or deaths during the monotherapy or combination periods. 6 mg was declared the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for q7d dosing as 2 of 8 pts experienced dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). For 6 mg q21d (n = 7), no drug-related dose reductions, discontinuations, or deaths have occurred during the monotherapy period; combination period data are not mature. 10 mg was declared the MTD for q21d dosing as 1 of 9 pts experienced DLTs and 3 had TRAEs leading to dose reductions. Systemic exposure to nemvaleukin increased with increasing dose. Increases in NK cells and CD8 + T cells of approximately 16-fold and 3-fold, respectively, at 3 mg q7d, and approximately 8-fold and 3-fold, respectively, at 6 mg q21d were observed, with minimal change in T regs. 46 pts had at least 1 on-treatment scan as of the data cutoff date, and 30 (65%) had stable disease (SD) on the first scan. Of the 30 pts with ≥2 scans, 13 (43%) had 2+ consecutive scans of SD. 16 of 57 pts remain on therapy. Antitumor activity data for more recent cohorts are still maturing. Based on the totality of the safety, PD effects, and antitumor activity data, 3 mg q7d was selected as the RP2D for SC nemvaleukin. Conclusions: SC nemvaleukin 3 mg q7d was generally well tolerated as monotherapy and in combination with pembrolizumab, and demonstrated robust PD effects on NK cells and CD8 + T cells with minimal expansion of T regs. These PD effects are similar to or greater than those observed with intravenous nemvaleukin. Thus, 3 mg q7d was selected as RP2D; phase 2 expansion cohorts for combination with pembrolizumab are enrolling. Clinical trial information: NCT03861793.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Journal of Clinical Oncology
          JCO
          American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
          0732-183X
          1527-7755
          May 20 2021
          May 20 2021
          : 39
          : 15_suppl
          : 2552
          Affiliations
          [1 ]The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA;
          [2 ]Georgetown University, Department of Hematology and Oncology, School of Medicine, Washington, DC;
          [3 ]Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders, Bethesda, MD;
          [4 ]Utah Cancer Spclsts, Salt Lake City, UT;
          [5 ]University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati, OH;
          [6 ]Atlantic Health System, Morristown, NJ;
          [7 ]Carolina BioOncology Institute, Huntersville, NC;
          [8 ]Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA;
          [9 ]University of Michigan Cancer Center, Detroit, MI;
          [10 ]Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA;
          [11 ]Johns Hopkins Univ School of Medcn, Baltimore, MD;
          [12 ]Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI;
          [13 ]The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX;
          [14 ]Alkermes, Inc., Waltham, MA;
          [15 ]Alkermes Inc, Waltham, MA;
          [16 ]Alkermes, Inc, Waltham, MA;
          [17 ]Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH;
          Article
          10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.2552
          34152804
          6bcc5355-f3b1-4aed-85b8-8a4150fea1cd
          © 2021
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article

          scite_
          0
          0
          0
          0
          Smart Citations
          0
          0
          0
          0
          Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
          View Citations

          See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

          scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

          Similar content24

          Cited by8