34
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    2
    shares

      To submit your manuscript, please click here

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Web-Based Technologies to Support Carers of People Living With Dementia: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

      research-article
      , BAppSC(OT), MAppSc, PhD 1 , , PhD 2 , , RN, BA, MSPD, PhD 3 , 4 , , BAHons, PhD 5 , 6 , , RDPsych, PhD 7 , , PhD 8 , , MA, PhD 9 , , RN, MBA 10 , , BMed, PhD 1 ,
      (Reviewer), (Reviewer), (Reviewer)
      JMIR Research Protocols
      JMIR Publications
      virtual, dementia, community, rural, carer, caregiver, mobile phone

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Informal carers play a significant role in supporting people living with dementia; however, carers in rural areas are often isolated, with limited access to support services. Although dementia-friendly communities provide valued support for carers, access to them is limited as they are few and geographically dispersed.

          Objective

          This study’s aim was to increase support and services for rural informal carers of people living with dementia by using information and communication technologies accessed through an integrated website and mobile app—the Verily Connect app. The objective of this protocol is to detail the research design used in a complex study that was situated in a challenging real-world setting integrating web-based and on-ground technology and communication. Therefore, it is anticipated that this protocol will strengthen the research of others exploring similar complex concepts.

          Methods

          A stepped-wedge, open-cohort cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted to implement Verily Connect across 12 rural Australian communities. The Verily Connect intervention delivered web-based, curated information about dementia, a localized directory of dementia services and support, group and individual chat forums, and peer support through videoconference. During the implementation phase of 32 weeks, Verily Connect was progressively implemented in four 8-weekly waves of 3 communities per wave. Usual care, used as a comparator, was available to carers throughout the study period. Participants and researchers were unblinded to the intervention. There were 3 cohorts of participants: carers, volunteers, and staff; participants were recruited from their communities. The primary outcome measure was perceived carer social support measured using the Medical Outcomes Study-Social Support Survey. Volunteers and staff provided feedback on their participation in Verily Connect as qualitative data. Qualitative data were collected from all cohorts of participants through interviews and focus groups. Process evaluation data were collected through interviews and memos written by research staff. Data on the costs of implementing Verily Connect were collected by the research team members and evaluated by a health economist.

          Results

          Between August 2018 and September 2019, a total of 113 participants were recruited. There were 37 (32.7%) carers, 39 (34.5%) volunteers, and 37 (32.7%) health service staff. The study was complex because of the involvement of multiple and varied communities of carers, volunteers, health service staff, and research team members originating from 5 universities. Web-based technologies were used as intervention strategies to support carers and facilitate the process of undertaking the study.

          Conclusions

          The Verily Connect trial enabled the testing and further development of a web-based approach to increasing support for carers of people living with dementia across a diverse rural landscape in Australia. This protocol provides an example of how to conduct a pragmatic evaluation of a complex and co-designed intervention involving multiple stakeholders.

          Trial Registration

          Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12618001213235; https://tinyurl.com/4rjvrasf

          International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)

          RR1-10.2196/33023

          Related collections

          Most cited references47

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Using thematic analysis in psychology

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science

            Background Many interventions found to be effective in health services research studies fail to translate into meaningful patient care outcomes across multiple contexts. Health services researchers recognize the need to evaluate not only summative outcomes but also formative outcomes to assess the extent to which implementation is effective in a specific setting, prolongs sustainability, and promotes dissemination into other settings. Many implementation theories have been published to help promote effective implementation. However, they overlap considerably in the constructs included in individual theories, and a comparison of theories reveals that each is missing important constructs included in other theories. In addition, terminology and definitions are not consistent across theories. We describe the Consolidated Framework For Implementation Research (CFIR) that offers an overarching typology to promote implementation theory development and verification about what works where and why across multiple contexts. Methods We used a snowball sampling approach to identify published theories that were evaluated to identify constructs based on strength of conceptual or empirical support for influence on implementation, consistency in definitions, alignment with our own findings, and potential for measurement. We combined constructs across published theories that had different labels but were redundant or overlapping in definition, and we parsed apart constructs that conflated underlying concepts. Results The CFIR is composed of five major domains: intervention characteristics, outer setting, inner setting, characteristics of the individuals involved, and the process of implementation. Eight constructs were identified related to the intervention (e.g., evidence strength and quality), four constructs were identified related to outer setting (e.g., patient needs and resources), 12 constructs were identified related to inner setting (e.g., culture, leadership engagement), five constructs were identified related to individual characteristics, and eight constructs were identified related to process (e.g., plan, evaluate, and reflect). We present explicit definitions for each construct. Conclusion The CFIR provides a pragmatic structure for approaching complex, interacting, multi-level, and transient states of constructs in the real world by embracing, consolidating, and unifying key constructs from published implementation theories. It can be used to guide formative evaluations and build the implementation knowledge base across multiple studies and settings.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                JMIR Res Protoc
                JMIR Res Protoc
                ResProt
                JMIR Research Protocols
                JMIR Publications (Toronto, Canada )
                1929-0748
                May 2022
                19 May 2022
                : 11
                : 5
                : e33023
                Affiliations
                [1 ] John Richards Centre for Rural Ageing Research La Trobe Rural Health School La Trobe University Wodonga Australia
                [2 ] Canadian Centre for Health and Safety in Agriculture University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, SK Canada
                [3 ] Faculty of Health Southern Cross University Bilinga Australia
                [4 ] College of Medicine and Public Health Flinders Medical Centre Flinders University Renmark Australia
                [5 ] Centre for Rural and Remote Mental Health The University of Newcastle Orange Australia
                [6 ] Health Research Institute University of Canberra Canberra Australia
                [7 ] Department of Psychology University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, SK Canada
                [8 ] Australian Centre for Evidence Based Aged Care La Trobe University Melbourne Australia
                [9 ] Social Innovation Research Institute Swinburne University of Technology Melbourne Australia
                [10 ] Wimmera Health Care Group Horsham Australia
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Irene Blackberry i.blackberry@ 123456latrobe.edu.au
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2467-4264
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6344-6822
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8325-2139
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9739-7339
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6159-4322
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5403-0227
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1730-2622
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4077-8338
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4482-4936
                Article
                v11i5e33023
                10.2196/33023
                9164093
                35588366
                69b1866d-e190-4905-8f6b-f65defcbdb7c
                ©Clare Wilding, Debra Morgan, Jennene Greenhill, David Perkins, Megan E O'Connell, Michael Bauer, Jane Farmer, Catherine Morley, Irene Blackberry. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 19.05.2022.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

                History
                : 18 August 2021
                : 16 November 2021
                : 15 February 2022
                : 26 April 2022
                Categories
                Protocol
                Protocol

                virtual,dementia,community,rural,carer,caregiver,mobile phone
                virtual, dementia, community, rural, carer, caregiver, mobile phone

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content130

                Cited by2

                Most referenced authors818