28
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      KRAS-G12C Mutation in One Real-Life and Three Population-Based Nordic Cohorts of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          KRAS mutations, present in over 40% of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), are negative predictive factors for anti-EGFR therapy. Mutations in KRAS-G12C have a cysteine residue for which drugs have been developed. Published data on this specific mutation are conflicting; thus, we studied the frequency and clinical characteristics in a real-world and population-based setting.

          Methods

          Patients from three Nordic population-based cohorts and the real-life RAXO-study were combined. RAS and BRAF tests were performed in routine healthcare, except for one cohort. The dataset consisted of 2,559 patients, of which 1,871 could be accurately classified as KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF-V600E. Demographics, treatments, and outcomes were compared using logistic regression. Overall survival (OS) was estimated with Kaplan–Meier, and differences were compared using Cox regression, adjusted for baseline factors.

          Results

          The KRAS-G12C frequency was 2%–4% of all tested in the seven cohorts (mean 3%) and 4%–8% of KRAS mutated tumors in the cohorts (mean 7%). Metastasectomies and ablations were performed more often (38% vs. 28%, p = 0.040), and bevacizumab was added more often (any line 74% vs. 59%, p = 0.007) for patients with KRAS-G12C- vs. other KRAS-mutated tumors, whereas chemotherapy was given to similar proportions. OS did not differ according to KRAS mutation, neither overall (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.03; 95% CI 0.74–1.42, reference KRAS-G12C) nor within treatment groups defined as “systemic chemotherapy, alone or with biologics”, “metastasectomy and/or ablations”, or “best supportive care”, RAS and BRAF wild-type tumors (n = 548) differed similarly to KRAS-G12C, as to other KRAS- or NRAS-mutated (n = 66) tumors.

          Conclusions

          In these real-life and population-based cohorts, there were no significant differences in patient characteristics and outcomes between patients with KRAS-G12C tumors and those with other KRAS mutations. This contrasts with the results of most previous studies claiming differences in many aspects, often with worse outcomes for those with a KRAS-G12C mutation, although not consistent. When specific drugs are developed, as for this mutation, differences in outcome will hopefully emerge.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Cancer genome landscapes.

          Over the past decade, comprehensive sequencing efforts have revealed the genomic landscapes of common forms of human cancer. For most cancer types, this landscape consists of a small number of "mountains" (genes altered in a high percentage of tumors) and a much larger number of "hills" (genes altered infrequently). To date, these studies have revealed ~140 genes that, when altered by intragenic mutations, can promote or "drive" tumorigenesis. A typical tumor contains two to eight of these "driver gene" mutations; the remaining mutations are passengers that confer no selective growth advantage. Driver genes can be classified into 12 signaling pathways that regulate three core cellular processes: cell fate, cell survival, and genome maintenance. A better understanding of these pathways is one of the most pressing needs in basic cancer research. Even now, however, our knowledge of cancer genomes is sufficient to guide the development of more effective approaches for reducing cancer morbidity and mortality.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

            Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common malignancies in Western countries. Over the last 20 years, and the last decade in particular, the clinical outcome for patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC) has improved greatly due not only to an increase in the number of patients being referred for and undergoing surgical resection of their localised metastatic disease but also to a more strategic approach to the delivery of systemic therapy and an expansion in the use of ablative techniques. This reflects the increase in the number of patients that are being managed within a multidisciplinary team environment and specialist cancer centres, and the emergence over the same time period not only of improved imaging techniques but also prognostic and predictive molecular markers. Treatment decisions for patients with mCRC must be evidence-based. Thus, these ESMO consensus guidelines have been developed based on the current available evidence to provide a series of evidence-based recommendations to assist in the treatment and management of patients with mCRC in this rapidly evolving treatment setting.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              KRASG12C Inhibition with Sotorasib in Advanced Solid Tumors

              No therapies for targeting KRAS mutations in cancer have been approved. The KRAS p.G12C mutation occurs in 13% of non–small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) and in 1 to 3% of colorectal cancers and other cancers. Sotorasib is a small molecule that selectively and irreversibly targets KRAS G12C . We conducted a phase 1 trial of sotorasib in patients with advanced solid tumors harboring the KRAS p.G12C mutation. Patients received sotorasib orally once daily. The primary end point was safety. Key secondary end points were pharmacokinetics and objective response, as assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), version 1.1. A total of 129 patients (59 with NSCLC, 42 with colorectal cancer, and 28 with other tumors) were included in dose escalation and expansion cohorts. Patients had received a median of 3 (range, 0 to 11) previous lines of anticancer therapies for metastatic disease. No dose-limiting toxic effects or treatment-related deaths were observed. A total of 73 patients (56.6%) had treatment-related adverse events; 15 patients (11.6%) had grade 3 or 4 events. In the subgroup with NSCLC, 32.2% (19 patients) had a confirmed objective response (complete or partial response) and 88.1% (52 patients) had disease control (objective response or stable disease); the median progression-free survival was 6.3 months (range, 0.0+ to 14.9 [with + indicating that the value includes patient data that were censored at data cutoff]). In the subgroup with colorectal cancer, 7.1% (3 patients) had a confirmed response, and 73.8% (31 patients) had disease control; the median progression-free survival was 4.0 months (range, 0.0+ to 11.1+). Responses were also observed in patients with pancreatic, endometrial, and appendiceal cancers and melanoma. Sotorasib showed encouraging anticancer activity in patients with heavily pretreated advanced solid tumors harboring the KRAS p.G12C mutation. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related toxic effects occurred in 11.6% of the patients. (Funded by Amgen and others; CodeBreaK100 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03600883 .)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Oncol
                Front Oncol
                Front. Oncol.
                Frontiers in Oncology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2234-943X
                16 February 2022
                2022
                : 12
                : 826073
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University , Uppsala, Sweden
                [2] 2Department of Pathology, HUSLAB, HUS Diagnostic Center, Helsinki University Hospital , Helsinki, Finland
                [3] 3Applied Tumor Genomics Research Program, Research Programs Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki , Helsinki, Finland
                [4] 4Department of Genetics, HUSLAB, HUS Diagnostic Center, Helsinki University Hospital , Helsinki, Finland
                [5] 5Department of Genetics, University of Helsinki , Helsinki, Finland
                [6] 6Department of Pathology, Central Finland Hospital Nova , Jyväskylä, Finland
                [7] 7Department of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä , Jyväskylä, Finland
                [8] 8Department of Oncology, Turku University Hospital , Turku, Finland
                [9] 9Department of Oncology, University of Turku , Turku, Finland
                [10] 10Department of Oncology, South Carelia Central Hospital , Lappeenranta, Finland
                [11] 11Department of Oncology, University of Helsinki , Helsinki, Finland
                [12] 12Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital , Helsinki, Finland
                [13] 13Department of Oncology, Oulu University Hospital , Oulu, Finland
                [14] 14Department of Oncology, University of Oulu , Oulu, Finland
                [15] 15Home Care, Geriatric Clinic and Palliative Care, Joint Municipal Authority for Health Care and Social Services in Keski-Uusimaa , Hyvinkää, Finland
                [16] 16Department of Pathology, Turku University Hospital , Turku, Finland
                [17] 17Institute of Biomedicine, University of Turku , Turku, Finland
                [18] 18Department of Genetics, Fimlab Laboratories , Tampere, Finland
                [19] 19Department of Oncology, Haukeland University Hospital , Bergen, Norway
                [20] 20Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen , Bergen, Norway
                [21] 21Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital , Odense, Denmark
                [22] 22Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark , Odense, Denmark
                [23] 23Department of Oncology, Tampere University Hospital , Tampere, Finland
                [24] 24Department of Oncology, University of Tampere , Tampere, Finland
                [25] 25Department of Oncology, Kuopio University Hospital , Kuopio, Finland
                [26] 26Department of Medicine, University of Eastern Finland , Kuopio, Finland
                [27] 27Department of Pathology, Oulu University Hospital , Oulu, Finland
                [28] 28Department of Pathology, Cancer and Translational Medicine Research Unit, University of Oulu, and Medical Research Center Oulu , Oulu, Finland
                [29] 29Department of Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital , Helsinki, Finland
                [30] 30Department of Surgery, University of Helsinki , Helsinki, Finland
                [31] 31Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset , Stockholm, Sweden
                [32] 32Department of Oncology/Pathology, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm, Sweden
                Author notes

                Edited by: Chiara Nicolazzo, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy

                Reviewed by: Veronica Aran, Instituto Estadual do Cérebro Paulo Niemeyer (IECPN), Brazil; Jean-Christophe Sabourin, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Rouen, France

                This article was submitted to Molecular and Cellular Oncology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Oncology

                †These authors have contributed equally to this work and share last authorship

                Article
                10.3389/fonc.2022.826073
                8889930
                35251991
                61c3be78-a27e-403d-8245-a97ec1bd3307
                Copyright © 2022 Osterlund, Ristimäki, Kytölä, Kuopio, Heervä, Muhonen, Halonen, Kallio, Soveri, Sundström, Keinänen, Ålgars, Ristamäki, Sorbye, Pfeiffer, Nunes, Salminen, Lamminmäki, Mäkinen, Sjöblom, Isoniemi, Glimelius and Osterlund

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 30 November 2021
                : 17 January 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 40, Pages: 11, Words: 5966
                Funding
                Funded by: Finska Läkaresällskapet , doi 10.13039/100010135;
                Funded by: Syöpäsäätiö , doi 10.13039/501100010711;
                Funded by: Tays , doi 10.13039/501100010600;
                Funded by: Turun Yliopistollinen Keskussairaala , doi 10.13039/501100011797;
                Funded by: Helsingin ja Uudenmaan Sairaanhoitopiiri , doi 10.13039/100008376;
                Funded by: Oulun Yliopistollinen Sairaala , doi 10.13039/501100018949;
                Funded by: Kuopion Yliopistollinen Sairaala , doi 10.13039/501100004092;
                Funded by: Sigrid Juséliuksen Säätiö , doi 10.13039/501100006306;
                Funded by: Cancerfonden , doi 10.13039/501100002794;
                Categories
                Oncology
                Original Research

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                colorectal cancer,metastatic,kras mutation,kras-g12c mutation,population-based,real-world

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content461

                Cited by13

                Most referenced authors930