Processing math: 100%
14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Recognising and applying equivalent meanings: an example of creating a codebook from a language-game of extremism in the Czech Republic

      Quality & Quantity
      Springer Science and Business Media LLC

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references54

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe

          Cas Mudde (2007)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Conceptual “Stretching” Revisited: Adapting Categories in Comparative Analysis.

            When scholars extend their models and hypotheses to encompass additional cases, they commonly need to adapt their analytic categories to fit the new contexts. Giovanni Sartori's work on conceptual “traveling” and conceptual “stretching” provides helpful guidance in addressing this fundamental task of comparative analysis. Yet Sartori's framework draws upon what may be called classical categorization, which views the relation among categories in terms of a taxonomic hierarchy, with each category having clear boundaries and defining properties shared by all members. We examine the challenge to this framework presented by two types of nonclassical categories: family resemblances and radial categories. With such categories, the overly strict application of a classical framework can lead to abandoning to category prematurely or to modifying it inappropriately. We discuss solutions to these problems, using examples of how scholars have adapted their categories in comparative research on democracy and authoritarianism.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              Qualitative inquiry and research design

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Quality & Quantity
                Qual Quant
                Springer Science and Business Media LLC
                0033-5177
                1573-7845
                May 20 2022
                Article
                10.1007/s11135-022-01418-5
                61c2b2f1-2dd5-4e04-9057-b4d5ae0f4470
                © 2022

                https://www.springer.com/tdm

                https://www.springer.com/tdm

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content1,933

                Cited by1

                Most referenced authors255