7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Cilostazol for Secondary Stroke Prevention: History, Evidence, Limitations, and Possibilities.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Cilostazol is a PDE3 (phosphodiesterase III) inhibitor with a long track record of safety that is Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency approved for the treatment of claudication in patients with peripheral arterial disease. In addition, cilostazol has been approved for secondary stroke prevention in several Asian countries based on trials that have demonstrated a reduction in stroke recurrence among patients with noncardioembolic stroke. The onset of benefit appears after 60 to 90 days of treatment, which is consistent with cilostazol's pleiotropic effects on platelet aggregation, vascular remodeling, blood flow, and plasma lipids. Cilostazol appears safe and does not increase the risk of major bleeding when given alone or in combination with aspirin or clopidogrel. Adverse effects such as headache, gastrointestinal symptoms, and palpitations, however, contributed to a 6% increase in drug discontinuation among patients randomized to cilostazol in a large secondary stroke prevention trial (CSPS.com [Cilostazol Stroke Prevention Study for Antiplatelet Combination]). Due to limitations of prior trials, such as open-label design, premature trial termination, large loss to follow-up, lack of functional or cognitive outcome data, and exclusive enrollment in Asia, the existing trials have not led to a change in clinical practice or guidelines in Western countries. These limitations could be addressed by a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial conducted in a broader population. If positive, it would increase the evidence in support of long-term treatment with cilostazol for secondary prevention in the millions of patients worldwide who have experienced a noncardioembolic ischemic stroke.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Stroke
          Stroke
          Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
          1524-4628
          0039-2499
          October 2021
          : 52
          : 10
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Neurology, University of Utah (A.d.H.).
          [2 ] Department of Neurology, Yale University (K.N.S.).
          [3 ] Department of Emergency Medicine, Brown University (T.E.M.).
          [4 ] Department of Neurology, University of Virginia (K.C.J.).
          [5 ] Department of Neurology, Medical University of South Carolina (T.N.T., J.J.E.).
          [6 ] Department of Cerebrovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Japan (K.T.).
          [7 ] Center for Clinical Brain Sciences, UK Dementia Research Institute, University of Edinburgh (J.M.W.).
          [8 ] Dell Medical School (S.C.J.).
          [9 ] Department of Neurology, Columbia University (O.A.W.).
          [10 ] Department of Medicine (Neurology), McMaster University/Population Heath Research Institute (A.S.).
          [11 ] Department of Neurology, Stanford University (M.G.L.).
          Article
          NIHMS1733119
          10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.035002
          8478840
          34517768
          61b6f2f4-20d0-4a17-aafe-74d801e051ac
          History

          humans,headache,follow-up studies,brain ischemia,aspirin
          humans, headache, follow-up studies, brain ischemia, aspirin

          Comments

          Comment on this article