8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Have the recent advancements in cancer therapy and survival benefitted patients of all age groups across the Nordic countries? NORDCAN survival analyses 2002–2021

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Since the early 2000s, overall and site-specific cancer survival have improved substantially in the Nordic countries. We evaluated whether the improvements have been similar across countries, major cancer types, and age groups.

          Material and methods

          Using population-based data from the five Nordic cancer registries recorded in the NORDCAN database, we included a cohort of 1,525,854 men and 1,378,470 women diagnosed with cancer (except non-melanoma skin cancer) during 2002–2021, and followed for death until 2021. We estimated 5-year relative survival (RS) in 5-year calendar periods, and percentage points (pp) differences in 5-year RS from 2002–2006 until 2017–2021. Separate analyses were performed for eight cancer sites (i.e. colorectum, pancreas, lung, breast, cervix uteri, kidney, prostate, and melanoma of skin).

          Results

          Five-year RS improved across nearly all cancer sites in all countries (except Iceland), with absolute differences across age groups ranging from 1 to 21 pp (all cancer sites), 2 to 20 pp (colorectum), -1 to 36 pp (pancreas), 2 to 28 pp (lung), 0 to 9 pp (breast), -11 to 26 pp (cervix uteri), 2 to 44 pp (kidney), -2 to 23 pp (prostate) and -3 to 30 pp (skin melanoma). The oldest patients (80–89 years) exhibited lower survival across all countries and sites, although with varying improvements over time.

          Interpretation

          Nordic cancer patients have generally experienced substantial improvements in cancer survival during the last two decades, including major cancer sites and age groups. Although survival has improved over time, older patients remain at a lower cancer survival compared to younger patients.

          Related collections

          Most cited references49

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Global surveillance of trends in cancer survival 2000–14 (CONCORD-3): analysis of individual records for 37 513 025 patients diagnosed with one of 18 cancers from 322 population-based registries in 71 countries

          In 2015, the second cycle of the CONCORD programme established global surveillance of cancer survival as a metric of the effectiveness of health systems and to inform global policy on cancer control. CONCORD-3 updates the worldwide surveillance of cancer survival to 2014.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Progress in cancer survival, mortality, and incidence in seven high-income countries 1995–2014 (ICBP SURVMARK-2): a population-based study

            Population-based cancer survival estimates provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of cancer services and can reflect the prospects of cure. As part of the second phase of the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership (ICBP), the Cancer Survival in High-Income Countries (SURVMARK-2) project aims to provide a comprehensive overview of cancer survival across seven high-income countries and a comparative assessment of corresponding incidence and mortality trends.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              From chemotherapy to biological therapy: A review of novel concepts to reduce the side effects of systemic cancer treatment (Review)

              The side effects of systemic chemotherapy used to treat cancer are often severe. For decades, oncologists have focused on treating the tumor, which may result in damage to the tumor-bearing host and its immune system. Recently, much attention has been paid to the immune system of patients and its activation via biological therapies. Biological therapies, including immunotherapy and oncolytic virus (OV) therapy, are often more physiological and well tolerated. The present review elucidated how these therapies work and why these therapies may be better tolerated: i) In contrast to chemotherapy, immunotherapies induce a memory function of the adaptive immunity system; ii) immunotherapies aim to specifically activate the immune system against cancer; side effects are low due to immune tolerance mechanisms, which maintain the integrity of the body in the presence of B and T lymphocytes with their antigen-receptor specificities and; iii) the type I interferon response, which is evoked by OVs, is an ancient innate immune defense system. Biological and physiological therapies, which support the immune system, may therefore benefit cancer treatment. The present review focused on immunotherapy, with the aim of reducing side effects and increasing long-lasting efficacy in cancer therapy.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Acta Oncol
                Acta Oncol
                AO
                Acta Oncologica
                MJS Publishing on behalf of Acta Oncologica
                0284-186X
                1651-226X
                10 April 2024
                2024
                : 63
                : 35094
                Affiliations
                [a ]Cancer Registry of Norway, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
                [b ]Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
                [c ]Danish Cancer Institute, Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark
                [d ]Department Breast Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital (Herlev/Gentofte), Copenhagen, Denmark
                [e ]Finnish Cancer Registry, Helsinki, Finland
                [f ]Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
                [g ]National Hospital of the Faroe Islands, Tórshavn, Faroe Islands
                [h ]Icelandic Cancer Registry, Reykjavík, Iceland
                [i ]Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
                [j ]Biostatistics Research Group, Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, UK
                [k ]Regional Cancer Center Mid-Sweden, Uppsala, Sweden
                [l ]Swedish Cancer Registry, National Board of Health and Welfare, Stockholm, Sweden
                [m ]Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark
                Author notes
                CONTACT Anna L.V. Johansson anna.johansson@ 123456ki.se Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

                Supplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2024.35094

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1191-7231
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7223-8198
                Article
                AO-63-35094
                10.2340/1651-226X.2024.35094
                11332520
                38597666
                6162eb66-d872-4930-b8a9-18cef374cfbe
                © 2024 The Author(s)

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, with the condition of proper attribution to the original work.

                History
                : 17 December 2023
                : 08 March 2024
                Funding
                Funding This work was supported by the Nordic Cancer Union (NCU).
                Categories
                Original Article

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                cancer survival,epidemiology,denmark,finland,iceland,norway,sweden
                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                cancer survival, epidemiology, denmark, finland, iceland, norway, sweden

                Comments

                Comment on this article