3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      A final reply to Grove and Barden: The relevance of the Rorschach Comprehensive System for expert testimony.

      ,   ,
      Psychology, Public Policy, and Law
      American Psychological Association (APA)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Psychology, Public Policy, and Law
          Psychology, Public Policy, and Law
          American Psychological Association (APA)
          1076-8971
          2002
          2002
          : 8
          : 2
          : 235-246
          Article
          10.1037//1076-8971.8.2.235
          51fafcc3-3679-4800-a90e-4488ffc32345
          © 2002
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article

          scite_
          0
          0
          0
          0
          Smart Citations
          0
          0
          0
          0
          Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
          View Citations

          See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

          scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

          Similar content1,763