29
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Identification of Socio-demographic and Psychological Factors Affecting Women’s Propensity to Breastfeed: An Italian Cohort

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Exclusive breastfeeding until 6 months postpartum is a World Health Organization objective and benefits have been demonstrated for both mother and infant. It is important to clarify which factors influence breastfeeding intentions. Our objective was to assess and identify socio-demographic and psychological factors associated with breastfeeding intention in a sample of pregnant Italian women.

          Materials and Methods: This prospective study included 160 pregnant women. The following psychological constructs were measured using standardized questionnaires: anxiety, prenatal attachment, adult attachment, personality traits, and intention to breastfeed. Socio-demographic data were also collected using a self-report questionnaire. Assessment took place after the 20th gestational week.

          Results: Self-employment, age and feeding received as an infant were significantly related to breastfeeding intention. Regarding psychological factors, we also found that Neuroticism was negatively associated with mother’s breastfeeding intentions. Relationships between psychological constructs and breastfeeding attitude were examined and represented within a graphical modeling framework.

          Conclusion: It may be possible to identify women that are less inclined to breastfeed early on in pregnancy. This may aid healthcare staff to pay particular attention to women who show certain socio-demographic and psychological characteristics, so as to fulfill more focused programs.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Approximating discrete probability distributions with dependence trees

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Attachment styles among young adults: a test of a four-category model.

            A new 4-group model of attachment styles in adulthood is proposed. Four prototypic attachment patterns are defined using combinations of a person's self-image (positive or negative) and image of others (positive or negative). In Study 1, an interview was developed to yield continuous and categorical ratings of the 4 attachment styles. Intercorrelations of the attachment ratings were consistent with the proposed model. Attachment ratings were validated by self-report measures of self-concept and interpersonal functioning. Each style was associated with a distinct profile of interpersonal problems, according to both self- and friend-reports. In Study 2, attachment styles within the family of origin and with peers were assessed independently. Results of Study 1 were replicated. The proposed model was shown to be applicable to representations of family relations; Ss' attachment styles with peers were correlated with family attachment ratings.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers.

              Two data sources--self-reports and peer ratings--and two instruments--adjective factors and questionnaire scales--were used to assess the five-factor model of personality. As in a previous study of self-reports (McCrae & Costa, 1985b), adjective factors of neuroticism, extraversion, openness to experience, agreeableness-antagonism, and conscientiousness-undirectedness were identified in an analysis of 738 peer ratings of 275 adult subjects. Intraclass correlations among raters, ranging from .30 to .65, and correlations between mean peer ratings and self-reports, from .25 to .62, showed substantial cross-observer agreement on all five adjective factors. Similar results were seen in analyses of scales from the NEO Personality Inventory. Items from the adjective factors were used as guides in a discussion of the nature of the five factors. These data reinforce recent appeals for the adoption of the five-factor model in personality research and assessment.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                29 November 2016
                2016
                : 7
                : 1872
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Faculty of Psychology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University Milan, Italy
                [2] 2Clinical and Health Psychology Unit, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital Milan, Italy
                [3] 3Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Leiden University Leiden, Netherlands
                [4] 4University Centre of Statistics in the Biomedical Sciences, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University Milan, Italy
                [5] 5Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital Milan, Italy
                [6] 6Faculty of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University Milan, Italy
                Author notes

                Edited by: Gianluca Castelnuovo, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Italy

                Reviewed by: Michelle Dow Keawphalouk, Harvard University - Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA; Claudia Cormio, National Cancer Research Institute “Giovanni Paolo II”, Italy

                *Correspondence: Martina Bernardi, bernardi.martina@ 123456ymail.com Letizia Carnelli, carnelli.letizia@ 123456hsr.it

                This article was submitted to Psychology for Clinical Settings, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01872
                5126723
                27965610
                4aefbd81-6cfe-4b54-b7d0-953f91a8a443
                Copyright © 2016 Di Mattei, Carnelli, Bernardi, Jongerius, Brombin, Cugnata, Ogliari, Rinaldi, Candiani and Sarno.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 27 July 2016
                : 14 November 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 3, Equations: 0, References: 62, Pages: 9, Words: 0
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                breastfeeding,neuroticism,breastfeeding intention,psychological factors,italy

                Comments

                Comment on this article