19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Predictors of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Germany: a cross-sectional, population-based study

      research-article
      1 , 2 ,
      Postgraduate Medical Journal
      BMJ Publishing Group
      COVID-19, public health

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose of the study

          Achieving high COVID-19 vaccination rates is a key public health challenge. The study aims to investigate factors determining COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and adherence to prevention measures, in German adults.

          Study design

          This cross-sectional study was conducted in Germany, from 21 February 2021 to 3 April 2021, during the strict lockdown period of the third COVID-19 wave. A total of 2029 adults (75.3% women and median age 38 years) participated in an online survey. Participants completed a questionnaire assessing sociodemographic and anthropometric characteristics, adherence to COVID-19 prevention measures and willingness to vaccinate. Health literacy (HL), perceived stress, life satisfaction and adherence to Mediterranean diet (MD) were also assessed. Multiple linear and logistic regression analysis were employed.

          Results

          The median score of COVID-19 adherence to the prevention measures tool, was 23.08 (3.83) (range 1–35). A total of 57.5% of the participants were willing to vaccinate against COVID-19, 12.1% were unwilling and 30.4% were undecided. Linear regression analysis revealed that women, obese participants, those with a chronic disease and those willing to vaccinate, reported higher adherence to prevention measures. Older age, higher levels of HL, life satisfaction and adherence to MD were also positively associated with higher adherence. Logistic regression revealed that being a woman decreases the odds of having the willingness whereas, older age, higher education and adherence to measures, increase the odds of willingness to vaccinate.

          Conclusion

          The results of the study could be used by practitioners, researchers and policy-makers working in the field of prevention and management of COVID-19.

          Related collections

          Most cited references50

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A Global Measure of Perceived Stress

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The Satisfaction With Life Scale.

            This article reports the development and validation of a scale to measure global life satisfaction, the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS). Among the various components of subjective well-being, the SWLS is narrowly focused to assess global life satisfaction and does not tap related constructs such as positive affect or loneliness. The SWLS is shown to have favorable psychometric properties, including high internal consistency and high temporal reliability. Scores on the SWLS correlate moderately to highly with other measures of subjective well-being, and correlate predictably with specific personality characteristics. It is noted that the SWLS is Suited for use with different age groups, and other potential uses of the scale are discussed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Health literacy and public health: A systematic review and integration of definitions and models

              Background Health literacy concerns the knowledge and competences of persons to meet the complex demands of health in modern society. Although its importance is increasingly recognised, there is no consensus about the definition of health literacy or about its conceptual dimensions, which limits the possibilities for measurement and comparison. The aim of the study is to review definitions and models on health literacy to develop an integrated definition and conceptual model capturing the most comprehensive evidence-based dimensions of health literacy. Methods A systematic literature review was performed to identify definitions and conceptual frameworks of health literacy. A content analysis of the definitions and conceptual frameworks was carried out to identify the central dimensions of health literacy and develop an integrated model. Results The review resulted in 17 definitions of health literacy and 12 conceptual models. Based on the content analysis, an integrative conceptual model was developed containing 12 dimensions referring to the knowledge, motivation and competencies of accessing, understanding, appraising and applying health-related information within the healthcare, disease prevention and health promotion setting, respectively. Conclusions Based upon this review, a model is proposed integrating medical and public health views of health literacy. The model can serve as a basis for developing health literacy enhancing interventions and provide a conceptual basis for the development and validation of measurement tools, capturing the different dimensions of health literacy within the healthcare, disease prevention and health promotion settings.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Postgrad Med J
                Postgrad Med J
                postgradmedj
                pmj
                Postgraduate Medical Journal
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                0032-5473
                1469-0756
                February 2022
                3 February 2022
                3 February 2022
                : postgradmedj-2021-141365
                Affiliations
                [1 ]departmentPara-Clinical Sciences , The University of the West Indies at St Augustine Faculty of Medical Sciences , St Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago
                [2 ]Independent researcher , Berlin, Germany
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Sam Lawrence, Berlin, Germany; sam.lawrencegerman@ 123456gmail.com
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8844-1641
                Article
                postgradmedj-2021-141365
                10.1136/postgradmedj-2021-141365
                8822538
                35115377
                42d3c4ce-c737-472b-8344-58561070b974
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This article is made freely available for personal use in accordance with BMJ’s website terms and conditions for the duration of the covid-19 pandemic or until otherwise determined by BMJ. You may use, download and print the article for any lawful, non-commercial purpose (including text and data mining) provided that all copyright notices and trade marks are retained.

                History
                : 13 November 2021
                : 18 January 2022
                Categories
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                free

                Medicine
                covid-19,public health
                Medicine
                covid-19, public health

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content231

                Cited by44

                Most referenced authors1,031