258
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    8
    shares

      To submit to Bentham Journals, please click here

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Women And Hysteria In The History Of Mental Health

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Hysteria is undoubtedly the first mental disorder attributable to women, accurately described in the second millennium BC, and until Freud considered an exclusively female disease. Over 4000 years of history, this disease was considered from two perspectives: scientific and demonological. It was cured with herbs, sex or sexual abstinence, punished and purified with fire for its association with sorcery and finally, clinically studied as a disease and treated with innovative therapies. However, even at the end of 19 th century, scientific innovation had still not reached some places, where the only known therapies were those proposed by Galen. During the 20 th century several studies postulated the decline of hysteria amongst occidental patients (both women and men) and the escalating of this disorder in non-Western countries. The concept of hysterical neurosis is deleted with the 1980 DSM-III. The evolution of these diseases seems to be a factor linked with social “westernization”, and examining under what conditions the symptoms first became common in different societies became a priority for recent studies over risk factor.

          Related collections

          Most cited references73

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Biogenetic explanations and public acceptance of mental illness: systematic review of population studies.

          Biological or genetic models of mental illness are commonly expected to increase tolerance towards people with mental illness, by reducing notions of responsibility and blame. To investigate whether biogenetic causal attributions of mental illness among the general public are associated with more tolerant attitudes, whether such attributions are related to lower perceptions of guilt and responsibility, to what extent notions of responsibility are associated with rejection of people who are mentally ill, and how prevalent notions of responsibility are among the general public with regard to different mental disorders. A systematic review was conducted of representative population studies examining attitudes towards people with mental illness and beliefs about such disorders. We identified 33 studies relevant to this review. Generally, biogenetic causal attributions were not associated with more tolerant attitudes; they were related to stronger rejection in most studies examining schizophrenia. No published study reported on associations of biogenetic causal attributions and perceived responsibility. The stereotype of self-responsibility was unrelated to rejection in most studies. Public images of mental disorder are generally dominated by the stereotypes of unpredictability and dangerousness, whereas responsibility is less relevant. Biogenetic causal models are an inappropriate means of reducing rejection of people with mental illness.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Changes in the Prevalence of Major Depression and Comorbid Substance Use Disorders in the United States Between 1991–1992 and 2001–2002

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Increasing rates of depression.

              Several recent, large epidemiologic and family studies suggest important temporal changes in the rates of major depression: an increase in the rates in the cohorts born after World War II; a decrease in the age of onset with an increase in the late teenaged and early adult years; an increase between 1960 and 1975 in the rates of depression for all ages; a persistent gender effect, with the risk of depression consistently two to three times higher among women than men across all adult ages; a persistent family effect, with the risk about two to three times higher in first-degree relatives as compared with controls; and the suggestion of a narrowing of the differential risk to men and women due to a greater increase in risk of depression among young men. These trends, drawn from studies using comparable methods and modern diagnostic criteria, are evident in the United States, Sweden, Germany, Canada, and New Zealand, but not in comparable studies conducted in Korea and Puerto Rico and of Mexican-Americans living in the United States. These cohort changes cannot be fully attributed to artifacts of reporting, recall, mortality, or labeling and have implications for understanding the etiology of depression and for clinical practice.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health
                Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health
                CPEMH
                Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health : CP & EMH
                Bentham Open
                1745-0179
                19 October 2012
                2012
                : 8
                : 110-119
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Dipartimento di Storia, Beni Culturali e Territorio, Università di Cagliari, Italia
                [2 ]Department of Public Health and Clinical and Molecular Medicine, University of Cagliari, Italy
                Author notes
                [* ]Address correspondence to this author at the University of Cagliari, Italy; Tel/Fax: +390706093498; E-mail: mgcarta@ 123456tiscali.it
                Article
                CPEMH-8-110
                10.2174/1745017901208010110
                3480686
                23115576
                3d69e856-44b3-4e67-b064-4eb97ba12d0b
                © Tasca et al.; Licensee Bentham Open.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.

                History
                : 26 July 2012
                : 06 August 2012
                : 07 August 2012
                Categories
                Article

                Neurology
                history,hysteria,mental health,west,woman.,psychiatry
                Neurology
                history, hysteria, mental health, west, woman., psychiatry

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                186
                1
                84
                0
                Smart Citations
                186
                1
                84
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content295

                Cited by43

                Most referenced authors218