To explain the anomalously large decay rate of Σ+→p+μ+μ−, it was proposed that a new mechanism where a light CP-odd pseudoscalar boson of mA01=214.3 MeV makes a crucial contribution. Later, some authors have studied the transition π0→e+e− and Υ→γA01 in terms of the same mechanism and their result indicates that with the suggested mass one cannot fit the data. This discrepancy might be caused by experimental error of Σ+→p+μ+μ− because there were only a few events. Whether the mechanism is a reasonable one motivates us to investigate the transitions π0→e+e−;η(η′)→μ+μ−;ηc→μ+μ−;ηb→τ+τ− within the same framework. It is noted that for π0→e+e−, the standard model (SM) prediction is smaller than the data, whereas the experimental central value of η→μ+μ− is also above the SM prediction. It means that there should be extra contributions from other mechanisms and the contribution of A01 may be a possible one. Theoretically calculating the branching ratios of the concerned modes, we would check if we can obtain a universal mass for A01 which reconcile the theoretical predictions and data for all the modes. Unfortunately, we find that it is impossible to have such a mass with the same coupling |gℓ|. Therefore we conclude that the phenomenology does not favor such a light A01, even though a small window is still open.
See how this article has been cited at scite.ai
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.