3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Level of structural integration in people with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorders - applicability and associations with clinical parameters

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          The psychic structure of people with psychosis has been the subject of theoretical and qualitative considerations. However, it has not been sufficiently studied quantitatively. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore the structural abilities of people diagnosed with schizophrenia and schizoaffective psychosis using the Levels of Structural Integration Axis of the Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnosis System (OPD-2-LSIA). The study aimed to determine possible associations between the OPD-2-LSIA and central parameters of illness. Additionally, possible structural differences between people diagnosed with schizophrenia and schizoaffective psychosis were tested.

          Methods

          This cross-sectional study included 129 outpatients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorders. Measures of structural integration, symptom load, severity of illness, cognition, and social functioning were obtained. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the overall structural level and the structural dimensions. Correlation coefficients were computed to measure the associations between OPD-2-LSIA and variables regarding the severity of illness and psychosocial functioning. Regression models were used to measure the influence of illness-related variables on OPD-2-LSIA, and the influence of OPD-2-LSIA on psychosocial functioning. Participants diagnosed with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorders were examined with regard to possible group differences.

          Results

          The results of the OPD-2-LSIA showed that the overall structural level was between ‘moderate to low’ and ‘low level of structural integration’. Significant correlations were found between OPD-2-LSIA and psychotic symptoms (but not depressive symptoms), as well as between OPD-2-LSIA and psychosocial functioning. It was found that variables related to severity of illness had a significant impact on OPD-2-LSIA, with psychotic, but not depressive symptoms being significant predictors. OPD-2-LSIA was found to predict psychosocial functioning beyond symptoms and cognition. No significant differences were found between participants with schizophrenia and schizoaffective psychosis. There was also no correlation found between OPD-2-LSIA and depressive symptomatology (except for the subdimension Internal communication).

          Discussion

          Contrary to theoretical assumptions, the results of the study show a heterogenous picture of the psychic structure of people with psychosis. The associations between OPD-2-LSIA and severity of illness, particularly psychotic symptomatology, as well as the influence of OPD-2-LSIA on psychosocial functioning, are discussed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references87

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) for Schizophrenia

          The variable results of positive-negative research with schizophrenics underscore the importance of well-characterized, standardized measurement techniques. We report on the development and initial standardization of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) for typological and dimensional assessment. Based on two established psychiatric rating systems, the 30-item PANSS was conceived as an operationalized, drug-sensitive instrument that provides balanced representation of positive and negative symptoms and gauges their relationship to one another and to global psychopathology. It thus constitutes four scales measuring positive and negative syndromes, their differential, and general severity of illness. Study of 101 schizophrenics found the four scales to be normally distributed and supported their reliability and stability. Positive and negative scores were inversely correlated once their common association with general psychopathology was extracted, suggesting that they represent mutually exclusive constructs. Review of five studies involving the PANSS provided evidence of its criterion-related validity with antecedent, genealogical, and concurrent measures, its predictive validity, its drug sensitivity, and its utility for both typological and dimensional assessment.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Deficits in domains of social cognition in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis of the empirical evidence.

            Social cognition is strongly associated with functional outcome in schizophrenia, making it an important target for treatment. Our goal was to examine the average magnitude of differences between schizophrenia patients (SCs) and normal comparison (NCs) patients across multiple domains of social cognition recognized by the recent NIMH consensus statement: theory of mind (ToM), social perception, social knowledge, attributional bias, emotion perception, and emotion processing. We conducted a meta-analysis of peer-reviewed studies of social cognition in schizophrenia, published between 1980 and November, 2011. 112 studies reporting results from 3908 SCs and 3570 NCs met our inclusion criteria. SCs performed worse than NCs across all domains, with large effects for social perception (g = 1.04), ToM (g = 0.96), emotion perception (g = 0.89), and emotion processing (g = 0.88). Regression analyses showed that statistically significant heterogeneity in effects within domains was not explained by age, education, or gender. Greater deficits in social and emotion perception were associated with inpatient status, and greater deficits in emotion processing were associated with longer illness duration. Despite the limitations of existing studies, including lack of standardization or psychometric validation of measures, the evidence for deficits across multiple social cognitive domains in schizophrenia is clear. Future research should examine the role of neurobiological and psychosocial factors in models linking various aspects of deficit in schizophrenia, including social cognition, in order to identify targets for intervention.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Psychological interventions for psychosis: a meta-analysis of comparative outcome studies.

              Meta-analyses have demonstrated the efficacy of various interventions for psychosis, and a small number of studies have compared such interventions. The aim of this study was to provide further insight into the relative efficacy of psychological interventions for psychosis. Forty-eight outcome trials comparing psychological interventions for psychosis were identified. The comparisons included 3,295 participants. Categorization of interventions resulted in six interventions being compared against other interventions pooled. Hedges' g was calculated for all comparisons. Risk of bias was assessed using four items of the Cochrane risk of bias tool, and sensitivity analyses were conducted. Researcher allegiance was assessed, and sensitivity analyses were conducted for robust significant findings. Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) was significantly more efficacious than other interventions pooled in reducing positive symptoms (g=0.16). This finding was robust in all sensitivity analyses for risk of bias but lost significance in sensitivity analyses for researcher allegiance, which suffered from low power. Social skills training was significantly more efficacious in reducing negative symptoms (g=0.27). This finding was robust in sensitivity analyses for risk of bias and researcher allegiance. Significant findings for CBT, social skills training, and cognitive remediation for overall symptoms were not robust after sensitivity analyses. CBT was significantly more efficacious when compared directly with befriending for overall symptoms (g=0.42) and supportive counseling for positive symptoms (g=0.23). There are small but reliable differences in efficacy between psychological interventions for psychosis, and they occur in a pattern consistent with the specific factors of particular interventions.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/907379Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/838985Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1390997Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/987886Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/839996Role:
                Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1157058Role:
                Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/5872Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1579668Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2336830Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/873800Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/53384Role:
                Journal
                Front Psychiatry
                Front Psychiatry
                Front. Psychiatry
                Frontiers in Psychiatry
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-0640
                06 June 2024
                2024
                : 15
                : 1388478
                Affiliations
                [1] 1 Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité -Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health , Berlin, Germany
                [2] 2 International Psychoanalytic University Berlin , Berlin, Germany
                [3] 3 Psychotherapy Practice , Munich, Germany
                Author notes

                Edited by: Wing Chung Chang, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China

                Reviewed by: Elisabetta C. del Re, Harvard Medical School, United States

                Federico Pacchioni, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Italy

                *Correspondence: Samuel Bayer, Samuel.bayer@ 123456charite.de
                Article
                10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1388478
                11192590
                38911709
                38ed2341-f9fa-4436-8bd9-f37fcb72944f
                Copyright © 2024 Bayer, Bröcker, Stuke, Just, Bertram, Grimm, Maaßen, Büttner, Heinz, Bermpohl, Lempa, von Haebler and Montag

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 19 February 2024
                : 13 May 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 7, Equations: 0, References: 89, Pages: 14, Words: 7488
                Funding
                The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Publication fund Charité, BIH clinical fellowship for CM, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Psychoanalyse, Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik und Tiefenpsychologie (DGPT) e.V., Köhler-Stiftung.
                Categories
                Psychiatry
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                Schizophrenia

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                psychic structure,operationalized psychodynamic diagnosis,psychosocial functioning,severity of illness,psychosis,psychodynamic research,schizophrenia,schizoaffective disorder

                Comments

                Comment on this article