14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Landmark Detection in Cardiac MRI by Using a Convolutional Neural Network

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          To develop a convolutional neural network (CNN) solution for landmark detection in cardiac MRI (CMR).

          Materials and Methods

          This retrospective study included cine, late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), and T1 mapping examinations from two hospitals. The training set included 2329 patients (34 089 images; mean age, 54.1 years; 1471 men; December 2017 to March 2020). A hold-out test set included 531 patients (7723 images; mean age, 51.5 years; 323 men; May 2020 to July 2020). CNN models were developed to detect two mitral valve plane and apical points on long-axis images. On short-axis images, anterior and posterior right ventricular (RV) insertion points and left ventricular (LV) center points were detected. Model outputs were compared with manual labels assigned by two readers. The trained model was deployed to MRI scanners.

          Results

          For the long-axis images, successful detection of cardiac landmarks ranged from 99.7% to 100% for cine images and from 99.2% to 99.5% for LGE images. For the short-axis images, detection rates were 96.6% for cine, 97.6% for LGE, and 98.7% for T1 mapping. The Euclidean distances between model-assigned and manually assigned labels ranged from 2 to 3.5 mm for different landmarks, indicating close agreement between model-derived landmarks and manually assigned labels. For all views and imaging sequences, no differences between the models’ assessment of images and the readers’ assessment of images were found for the anterior RV insertion angle or LV length. Model inference for a typical cardiac cine series took 610 msec with the graphics processing unit and 5.6 seconds with central processing unit.

          Conclusion

          A CNN was developed for landmark detection on both long- and short-axis CMR images acquired with cine, LGE, and T1 mapping sequences, and the accuracy of the CNN was comparable with the interreader variation.

          Keywords: Cardiac, Heart, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Deep Learning Algorithms, Machine Learning Algorithms, Feature Detection, Quantification, Supervised Learning, MR Imaging

          Supplemental material is available for this article.

          Published under a CC BY 4.0 license.

          Abstract

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging.

          The rapid technological developments of the past decade and the changes in echocardiographic practice brought about by these developments have resulted in the need for updated recommendations to the previously published guidelines for cardiac chamber quantification, which was the goal of the joint writing group assembled by the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. This document provides updated normal values for all four cardiac chambers, including three-dimensional echocardiography and myocardial deformation, when possible, on the basis of considerably larger numbers of normal subjects, compiled from multiple databases. In addition, this document attempts to eliminate several minor discrepancies that existed between previously published guidelines.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Standardized image interpretation and post-processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance - 2020 update

            With mounting data on its accuracy and prognostic value, cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is becoming an increasingly important diagnostic tool with growing utility in clinical routine. Given its versatility and wide range of quantitative parameters, however, agreement on specific standards for the interpretation and post-processing of CMR studies is required to ensure consistent quality and reproducibility of CMR reports. This document addresses this need by providing consensus recommendations developed by the Task Force for Post-Processing of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR). The aim of the Task Force is to recommend requirements and standards for image interpretation and post-processing enabling qualitative and quantitative evaluation of CMR images. Furthermore, pitfalls of CMR image analysis are discussed where appropriate. It is an update of the original recommendations published 2013.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Road Extraction by Deep Residual U-Net

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Radiol Artif Intell
                Radiol Artif Intell
                ai
                Radiology: Artificial Intelligence
                Radiological Society of North America
                2638-6100
                14 July 2021
                September 2021
                : 3
                : 5
                : e200197
                Affiliations
                [1]From the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Dr, Bethesda, MD 20892 (H.X., P.K.); Barts Heart Centre, National Health Service, London, England (J.A., J.C.M., R.H.D.); and National Amyloidosis Centre, Royal Free Hospital, London, England (M.F.).
                Author notes
                Address correspondence to H.X. (e-mail: hui.xue@ 123456nih.gov ).

                Author contributions: Guarantor of integrity of entire study, H.X.; study concepts/study design or data acquisition or data analysis/interpretation, all authors; manuscript drafting or manuscript revision for important intellectual content, all authors; approval of final version of submitted manuscript, all authors; agrees to ensure any questions related to the work are appropriately resolved, all authors; literature research, H.X., J.A.; clinical studies, H.X., J.A., M.F., J.C.M.; experimental studies, H.X., J.A., R.H.D., P.K.; statistical analysis, H.X.; and manuscript editing, H.X., M.F., J.C.M., R.H.D., P.K.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4561-5530
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8071-1491
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7630-7517
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9875-6070
                Article
                200197
                10.1148/ryai.2021200197
                8489464
                34617022
                3503bc75-417c-4b93-b3df-3e3e64229827
                2021 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

                Published under a https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/CC BY 4.0 license.

                History
                : 17 August 2020
                : 28 October 2020
                : 28 April 2021
                : 15 June 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health
                Award ID: Z1A-HL006214-05
                Award ID: Z1A-HL006242-02
                Categories
                Original Research
                CA, Cardiac Radiology
                MR, Magnetic Resonance Imaging

                cardiac,heart,convolutional neural network (cnn),deep learning algorithms,machine learning algorithms,feature detection,quantification,supervised learning,mr imaging

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content373

                Cited by16

                Most referenced authors636