24
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Relationaler Umgang mit Krisen von Jugendamtsfachkräften in der Fallarbeit hinsichtlich der Auswirkungen der Covid-19-Pandemie Translated title: Relational dealing with crisis of youth welfare professionals in casework regarding the effects of the Covid 19 pandemic

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Über die Auswirkungen der Covid-19 Pandemie auf die Fallarbeit der Jugendämter liegt bislang noch wenig empirisches Wissen vor. Allerdings geben qualitative Studien eine Reihe von Hinweisen zur Bedeutung von Teamarbeit, zu expliziten und impliziten Handlungsweisen sowie zu Entscheidungspraktiken ( Sense-Making) von Fachkräften im Kinderschutz. Diese Aspekte wurden durch die Lockdowns und die pandemiebedingten Schutzmaßnahmen weitgehend eingeschränkt. Daraus ergibt sich die Frage der vorliegenden Studie nach dem Umgang mit diesen Einschränkungen und den darauf bezogenen Umgang.

          Grundlage der Analyse bildet die kontrastive Auswertung von Telefoninterviews mit Fachkräften zweier Jugendämter. Aus einer relationalen Perspektive im Sinne Bruno Latours, die den Blick nicht alleine auf die jeweiligen Akteur*innen, sondern vielmehr auf deren Verbindungen und Vernetzungen untereinander richtet, werden zunächst Verschiebungen des Netzwerkes, in dem die Fälle üblicherweise bearbeitet werden, sichtbar. Diese Transformationen wurden auf der Grundlage der Interviews als krisenhaft erlebte Einschränkungen der üblichen Handlungspraxis herausgearbeitet. In den analysierten Daten lassen sich Handlungsweisen rekonstruieren, die sich als Umgang mit dieser Krise fassen lassen. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass die eigentliche Krise nicht in der abstrakten Vorstellung einer Viruspandemie, sondern vor allem im Wegbrechen von Fallarbeitsgewohnheiten zu finden ist.

          Translated abstract

          There is still little empirical knowledge about the impact of the Covid 19 pandemic on the casework of youth welfare offices. However, qualitative studies provide a number of indications on the importance of teamwork, on explicit and implicit ways of acting as well as on decision-making practices (sense-making) of professionals in child protection. These aspects were largely limited by the lockdowns and the pandemic-related protective measures. This leads to the question of the present study about how these restrictions are dealt with and the coping strategies related to them.

          The analysis is based on the contrastive interpretation of telephone interviews with professionals from two youth welfare offices. From a relational perspective in the sense of Bruno Latour, which does not focus on the actors, but rather on their connections and relations, some transformations in the network in which the cases are usually processed become visible. These transformations were elaborated based on the interviews as crisis-like restrictions of the usual practice of action. In the analyzed data, ways of acting can be reconstructed that can be understood as dealing with these crises. The results show that the actual crisis is not to be found in the abstract idea of a virus pandemic, but above all in the breaking away of case work habits.

          Related collections

          Most cited references73

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.

          This article described three heuristics that are employed in making judgements under uncertainty: (i) representativeness, which is usually employed when people are asked to judge the probability that an object or event A belongs to class or process B; (ii) availability of instances or scenarios, which is often employed when people are asked to assess the frequency of a class or the plausibility of a particular development; and (iii) adjustment from an anchor, which is usually employed in numerical prediction when a relevant value is available. These heuristics are highly economical and usually effective, but they lead to systematic and predictable errors. A better understanding of these heuristics and of the biases to which they lead could improve judgements and decisions in situations of uncertainty.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Book: not found

            The Discovery of Grounded Theory : Strategies for Qualitative Research

            Most writing on sociological method has been concerned with how accurate facts can be obtained and how theory can thereby be more rigorously tested. In The Discovery of Grounded Theory, Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss address the equally Important enterprise of how the discovery of theory from data--systematically obtained and analyzed in social research--can be furthered. The discovery of theory from data--grounded theory--is a major task confronting sociology, for such a theory fits empirical situations, and is understandable to sociologists and laymen alike. Most important, it provides relevant predictions, explanations, interpretations, and applications. In Part I of the book, -Generation Theory by Comparative Analysis, - the authors present a strategy whereby sociologists can facilitate the discovery of grounded theory, both substantive and formal. This strategy involves the systematic choice and study of several comparison groups. In Part II, The Flexible Use of Data, - the generation of theory from qualitative, especially documentary, and quantitative data Is considered. In Part III, -Implications of Grounded Theory, - Glaser and Strauss examine the credibility of grounded theory. The Discovery of Grounded Theory is directed toward improving social scientists' capacity for generating theory that will be relevant to their research. While aimed primarily at sociologists, it will be useful to anyone Interested In studying social phenomena--political, educational, economic, industrial-- especially If their studies are based on qualitative data.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Reasoning the fast and frugal way: models of bounded rationality.

              Humans and animals make inferences about the world under limited time and knowledge. In contrast, many models of rational inference treat the mind as a Laplacean Demon, equipped with unlimited time, knowledge, and computational might. Following H. Simon's notion of satisfying, the authors have proposed a family of algorithms based on a simple psychological mechanism: one-reason decision making. These fast and frugal algorithms violate fundamental tenets of classical rationality: They neither look up nor integrate all information. By computer simulation, the authors held a competition between the satisfying "Take The Best" algorithm and various "rational" inference procedures (e.g., multiple regression). The Take The Best algorithm matched or outperformed all competitors in inferential speed and accuracy. This result in an existence proof that cognitive mechanisms capable of successful performance in the real world do not need to satisfy the classical norms of rational inference.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                pascal.bastian@rptu.de
                jana.posmek@rptu.de
                Journal
                Z Erziehwiss
                Z Erziehwiss
                Zeitschrift Fur Erziehungswissenschaft
                Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden (Wiesbaden )
                1434-663X
                1862-5215
                10 February 2023
                10 February 2023
                : 1-21
                Affiliations
                GRID grid.7645.0, ISNI 0000 0001 2155 0333, Fachbereich Erziehungswissenschaften, Institut für Bildung im Kindes- und Jugendalter, Arbeitsbereich Sozialpädagogik, , Rheinland-Pfälzische Technische Universität Kaiserslautern Landau, ; Bürgerstr. 23, 76829 Landau, Deutschland
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4750-2847
                Article
                1143
                10.1007/s11618-023-01143-1
                9912220
                31c4dd16-137a-46ec-9ccf-3cf947b07feb
                © The Author(s) 2023

                Open Access Dieser Artikel wird unter der Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International Lizenz veröffentlicht, welche die Nutzung, Vervielfältigung, Bearbeitung, Verbreitung und Wiedergabe in jeglichem Medium und Format erlaubt, sofern Sie den/die ursprünglichen Autor(en) und die Quelle ordnungsgemäß nennen, einen Link zur Creative Commons Lizenz beifügen und angeben, ob Änderungen vorgenommen wurden.

                Die in diesem Artikel enthaltenen Bilder und sonstiges Drittmaterial unterliegen ebenfalls der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz, sofern sich aus der Abbildungslegende nichts anderes ergibt. Sofern das betreffende Material nicht unter der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz steht und die betreffende Handlung nicht nach gesetzlichen Vorschriften erlaubt ist, ist für die oben aufgeführten Weiterverwendungen des Materials die Einwilligung des jeweiligen Rechteinhabers einzuholen.

                Weitere Details zur Lizenz entnehmen Sie bitte der Lizenzinformation auf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de.

                History
                : 11 May 2021
                : 15 July 2022
                : 10 October 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: Rheinland-Pfälzische Technische Universität Kaiserslautern-Landau (6375)
                Categories
                Allgemeiner Teil

                krise,umgang mit krisen,covid-19-pandemie,kinderschutz,crisis,dealing with crises,covid-19-pandemic,child protection

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content466

                Most referenced authors340