5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A network model of legal relations

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          From at least the early twentieth century, legal scholars have recognized that rights and other legal relations inhere between individual legal actors, forming a vast and complex social network. Yet, no legal scholar has used the mathematical machinery of network theory to formalize these relationships. Here, we propose the first such approach by modelling a rudimentary, static set of real property relations using network theory. Then, we apply our toy model to measure the level of modularity—essentially, the community structure—among aggregations of these real property relations and associated actors. In so doing, we show that even for a very basic set of relations and actors, law may employ modular structures to manage complexity. Property, torts, contracts, intellectual property, and other areas of the law arguably reduce information costs in similar, quantifiable ways by chopping up the world of interactions between parties into manageable modules that are semi-autonomous. We also posit that our network science approach to jurisprudential issues can be adapted to quantify many other important aspects of legal systems.

          This article is part of the theme issue 'A complexity science approach to law and governance'.

          Related collections

          Most cited references109

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Strength of Weak Ties

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Modularity and community structure in networks

            M. Newman (2006)
            Many networks of interest in the sciences, including social networks, computer networks, and metabolic and regulatory networks, are found to divide naturally into communities or modules. The problem of detecting and characterizing this community structure is one of the outstanding issues in the study of networked systems. One highly effective approach is the optimization of the quality function known as "modularity" over the possible divisions of a network. Here I show that the modularity can be expressed in terms of the eigenvectors of a characteristic matrix for the network, which I call the modularity matrix, and that this expression leads to a spectral algorithm for community detection that returns results of demonstrably higher quality than competing methods in shorter running times. I illustrate the method with applications to several published network data sets.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Finding and evaluating community structure in networks

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Journal
                Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci
                Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci
                RSTA
                roypta
                Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences
                The Royal Society
                1364-503X
                1471-2962
                April 15, 2024
                February 26, 2024
                February 26, 2024
                : 382
                : 2270 , Theme issue ‘A complexity science approach to law and governance’ compiled and edited by Daniel M. Katz, J. B. Ruhl and Pierpaolo Vivo
                : 20230153
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Judith Keep Professor of Law and Director Center for Intellectual Property Law and Markets; Founder and Director, Center for Computation, Mathematics, and the Law, University of San Diego School of Law, , San Diego, CA, USA
                [ 2 ] Fessenden Professor of Law and Director of the Project on the Foundations of Private Law, Harvard Law School, , Cambridge, MA, USA
                Author notes

                One contribution of 15 to a theme issue ‘ A complexity science approach to law and governance’.

                Electronic supplementary material is available online at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.7031262.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5236-7822
                Article
                rsta20230153
                10.1098/rsta.2023.0153
                10894693
                38403060
                2f27963b-7e73-45f7-aa77-85317f1440b5
                © 2024 The Authors.

                Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : May 31, 2023
                : December 4, 2023
                Categories
                1008
                194
                83
                Articles
                Research Articles
                Custom metadata
                April 15, 2024

                network theory,legal relations,rights,property,modularity,wesley hohfeld

                Comments

                Comment on this article