Recently, we published part one of our two-part critical training special issue series
(Bocanegra, 2021). Part one addressed the needs of minoritized populations and international
scholarship. This second installment presents critical training topics related to
school psychology’s shortages crisis and innovative training practices.
Shortages Crisis
The shortages crisis is a pressing issue affecting the profession of school psychology.
It has been cited as one of National Association of School Psychologists’ (NASP) strategic
goals (NASP, 2017). Understanding the impact of school psychology’s shortage crisis
and remediation efforts is important due to its potential impact on service delivery,
especially in rural communities (NASP, 2020a; NASP, 2021). Many potential causes of
the shortages and suggestions to remediate have been posited including increased exposure
to the field (Bocanegra et al., 2015) and the creation of more training programs (Marrs
et al., 2020). Furthermore, scholars have called for further research into this topic
(Bocanegra et al., 2019). Gischlar (2021, in this issue) surveyed undergraduate psychology
majors’ preferences and found that students with increased exposure to school psychology
within their undergraduate coursework reported greater interests in pursuing school
psychology. The authors also found differences by racial and ethnic minoritized identity
for the exposure variable but not for interest. Their findings largely mirrored previous
research (e.g., Bocanegra et al., 2016) and highlight the importance of early exposure
to the field and the creation and/or refinement of workforce pipelines.
Morrison et al., (2020, in this issue) presents a workforce pipeline analysis. A workforce
pipeline analysis is a data-driven approach that allows for better understanding of
personnel supply and demand issues and potential factors attributing to these issues,
which can be used to identify potential areas of improvements (American Psychological
Association, 2018; Morrison et al., 2020). Morrison and colleagues argue that conducting
school psychology workforce pipeline analysis is important in order identify and strengthen
school psychology career pipeline and, in turn, increase the number of school psychologists
in the field. They identified a potential disparity within their state’s workforce
pipeline in regard to minoritized populations.
However, several others have posited specific initiatives in attempts to ameliorate
the school psychology shortages especially within hard hit rural areas. Many of these
initiatives have been made possible through the expanding use of technology. For example,
Schmitz et al., (2021, in this issue) advocate for the use of a grow-your-own respecialization
model in order to train practitioners within rural communities. Within their article,
they outlined their own efforts in implementing a grow-your-own model, in addition
to potential challenges and opportunities. Similarly, McCleary et al., (2020, in this
issue) advocate for the use of distance education training programs within rural settings.
They present an overview of existing distance education research and describe the
history of one program’s attempts to implement a distance education school psychology
training program. The authors identify possible solutions to common challenges.
With the potential increased use of technology mediated instruction, it is important
that researchers elucidate upon potential impact of different instructional delivery
methods on graduate students’ learning outcomes. Thus, Ball et al., (2020, in this
issue) compared the effectiveness of campus instruction and distance-based instruction.
They measured outcome variables such as GPA, Praxis-II school psychology exam scores,
specialist projects, student retention, time to completion, and employment. The authors
reported a significant increase for distance learning students in the areas of need
of academic remediation plans, student withdrawal from program, and time to program
completion. The authors discuss the challenges and benefits of blended delivery and
implications for school psychology training.
The shortages crisis may also negatively impact school psychologists’ ability to implement
more comprehensive school psychology service delivery models (NASP, 2020a). For example,
NASP has highlighted the importance of school-based family engagement initiatives
in benefiting the education and mental health of K-12th grade students within their
professional standards (NASP, 2020b). Hendricker et al., (2021, in this issue) identify
the shortages crisis as a potential barrier to the implementation of such programs.
In their study, they found a negative relationship between the number of schools served
by a school psychologist and the availability of family focused school-based initiatives.
They also found that personnel type (e.g., social worker, counselor, school psychologist)
implementing family-based initiatives was impacted by the number of schools served
by the school psychologist. Unfortunately, the shortages crisis is a complex phenomenon
that is not projected to subside in the near future (Castillo et al., 2014) and is
impacted by availability of training programs, recruitment, retention, and attrition,
among others (Gadke et al., 2021).
Due to the role that attrition may play in exacerbating professional shortages, Daly
and Gardner (2020, in this issue) presented a case study exploring the benefits of
teaching self-care to school psychology graduate students. They argue that since school
psychologists tend to experience high levels of job burnout, it is important for school
psychology faculty to both model and instruct their students on self-care. The authors
outline their program’s attempt to teach students self-care and qualitative results
from their self-study are presented. For example, participants reported an increase
of self-care behaviors.
In addition, the shortages crisis, COVID-19 pandemic, and increased internet connectiveness
have also brought forth the proliferation of remotely administered cognitive assessments.
However, very little research has examined the training implications for the use of
such technology. Hence, Corcoran (2021, in this issue) compared administration errors
for traditional and digital formats of a cognitive assessment after course instruction
regarding their administration. Overall, the authors found significantly more errors
for the traditional compared to digital format. However, digital format still contained
errors, especially in areas requiring more complex or nuanced scoring. Data regarding
participants’ perception regarding their use of the traditional versus digital formats
are presented and implications are discussed.
Innovative Training Practices
As we attempt to meet the diverse needs of a rapidly changing nation and practice
landscape, it is important that trainers and scholars actively communicate with practitioners
regarding the competencies of school psychology trainees and the needs of the field.
In order to better understand supervisors’ perspectives of trainees’ competencies,
Ormiston et al., (2021, in this issue) created an electronic survey based on NASP’s
practice model. The authors present psychometric properties of their scales, study
results, and the potential use and limitations of their instrument. Improved understanding
of supervisors’ perspectives of trainees’ competencies could help trainers more effectively
develop and hone their students’ knowledge and skills.
Starling et al.’s (2020, in this issue) article echoes this focus on programmatic
self-exploration and development while discussing the need for specialization and
self-study within school psychology. The authors illustrate potential steps that could
be followed by training programs to create specialties within school psychology. The
authors highlight rationales and potential challenges in the creation of school psychology
specialties.
This emphasis on the importance of specializations, whether during graduate training
or after program completion, is potentially borne out of the acknowledgment of the
various roles and benefits that school psychologists can play in positively impacting
our nation’s schools, students, and families. For example, Drapeau (2021, in this
issue) examines the prevalence of sleep training within school psychology programs
and argues for the importance of such training due to the impact that sleep issues
can have on students’ behavioral and academic functioning. He also presents recommendations
for overcoming the identified lack of sleep training.
Similarly, Yu (2021, in this issue) examines the state of applied behavioral analysis
(ABA) training within school psychology. They found that the majority of programs
have few, if any, courses focused on these skills. They argue that due to the potential
benefit that ABA modalities can have on K-12th students, school psychology training
programs should increase their inclusion of ABA-related coursework.
Unfortunately, school psychology training programs have limited time to prepare their
students to meet the diverse needs of K-12th grade students. Thus, an important avenue
for specialization or new skill development will likely be post-graduation via continued
education. One area that has received increased interest within education and psychology
is self-regulated learning (SRL). Callan et al., (2020, in this issue) present a rationale
for and specific steps needed to prepare school psychologists to support students’
SRL, which is particularly important given the increased need for students to work
independently and self-regulate.
In summary, school psychology appears to be in a time of great opportunity. School
psychologists may be uniquely positioned to support the rapidly evolving needs of
our K-12th grade population. While the skills of school psychologists are in ever
increasing demand, the shortage of school psychologists persists, likely impacting
our ability to fully impact change. Although these challenges may require more time
to address, it is our hope that the articles presented within this special issue will
pave the way for further discussion, research, and action regarding these critical
training issues.