20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Generalized Prejudice: Lessons about social power, ideological conflict, and levels of abstraction

      1 , 2
      European Review of Social Psychology
      Informa UK Limited

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references121

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Network analysis: an integrative approach to the structure of psychopathology.

            In network approaches to psychopathology, disorders result from the causal interplay between symptoms (e.g., worry → insomnia → fatigue), possibly involving feedback loops (e.g., a person may engage in substance abuse to forget the problems that arose due to substance abuse). The present review examines methodologies suited to identify such symptom networks and discusses network analysis techniques that may be used to extract clinically and scientifically useful information from such networks (e.g., which symptom is most central in a person's network). The authors also show how network analysis techniques may be used to construct simulation models that mimic symptom dynamics. Network approaches naturally explain the limited success of traditional research strategies, which are typically based on the idea that symptoms are manifestations of some common underlying factor, while offering promising methodological alternatives. In addition, these techniques may offer possibilities to guide and evaluate therapeutic interventions.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory.

              The present article presents a meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. With 713 independent samples from 515 studies, the meta-analysis finds that intergroup contact typically reduces intergroup prejudice. Multiple tests indicate that this finding appears not to result from either participant selection or publication biases, and the more rigorous studies yield larger mean effects. These contact effects typically generalize to the entire outgroup, and they emerge across a broad range of outgroup targets and contact settings. Similar patterns also emerge for samples with racial or ethnic targets and samples with other targets. This result suggests that contact theory, devised originally for racial and ethnic encounters, can be extended to other groups. A global indicator of Allport's optimal contact conditions demonstrates that contact under these conditions typically leads to even greater reduction in prejudice. Closer examination demonstrates that these conditions are best conceptualized as an interrelated bundle rather than as independent factors. Further, the meta-analytic findings indicate that these conditions are not essential for prejudice reduction. Hence, future work should focus on negative factors that prevent intergroup contact from diminishing prejudice as well as the development of a more comprehensive theory of intergroup contact. Copyright 2006 APA.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                European Review of Social Psychology
                European Review of Social Psychology
                Informa UK Limited
                1046-3283
                1479-277X
                January 02 2023
                March 13 2022
                January 02 2023
                : 34
                : 1
                : 92-126
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Psychology, Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden
                [2 ]Department of Psychology, Michigan State University East Lansing United States
                Article
                10.1080/10463283.2022.2040140
                1c77686e-f006-408b-807d-d9726d55c140
                © 2023

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article