1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Validation of the Workplace Integrated Safety and Health (WISH) assessment in a sample of nursing homes using Item Response Theory (IRT) methods

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          To validate and test the dimensionality of six constructs from the Workplace Integrated Safety and Health (WISH) assessment, an instrument that assesses the extent to which organisations implement integrated systems approaches for protecting and promoting worker health, safety and well-being, in a sample of nursing homes in the USA.

          Design

          Validation of an assessment scale using data from a cross-sectional survey.

          Setting

          Nursing homes certified by the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare services in three states of the USA: Ohio, California and Massachusetts.

          Participants

          569 directors of nursing from nursing homes serving adults and with more than 30 beds participated in the study.

          Results

          Graded response Item Response Theory (IRT) models showed that five out of six constructs were unidimensional based on balanced interpretation of model fit statistics—M2 or C2 with p value >0.05, Comparative Fit Index >0.95, lower bound of the root mean squared error of approximation 90% CI <0.06 and standardised root mean square residual <0.08. Overall measure and construct reliability ranged from acceptable to good. Category boundary location parameters indicated that items were most informative for respondents in lower range of latent scores (ie, β 1, β 2, β 3 typically below 0). A few items were recommended to be dropped from future administrations of the instrument based on empirical and substantive interpretation.

          Conclusions

          The WISH instrument has utility to understand to what extent organisations integrate protection and promotion of worker health, safety and well-being; however, it is most informative in organisations that present lower scores.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          mirt: A Multidimensional Item Response Theory Package for theREnvironment

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Local Dependence Indexes for Item Pairs Using Item Response Theory

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Integrating worksite health protection and health promotion: A conceptual model for intervention and research.

              There is increasing recognition of the value added by integrating traditionally separate efforts to protect and promote worker safety and health. This paper presents an innovative conceptual model to guide research on determinants of worker safety and health and to inform the design, implementation and evaluation of integrated approaches to promoting and protecting worker health. This model is rooted in multiple theories and the premise that the conditions of work are important determinants of individual safety and health outcomes and behaviors, and outcomes important to enterprises such as absence and turnover. Integrated policies, programs and practices simultaneously address multiple conditions of work, including the physical work environment and the organization of work (e.g., psychosocial factors, job tasks and demands). Findings from two recent studies conducted in Boston and Minnesota (2009-2015) illustrate the application of this model to guide social epidemiological research. This paper focuses particular attention on the relationships of the conditions of work to worker health-related behaviors, musculoskeletal symptoms, and occupational injury; and to the design of integrated interventions in response to specific settings and conditions of work of small and medium size manufacturing businesses, based on a systematic assessment of priorities, needs, and resources within an organization. This model provides an organizing framework for both research and practice by specifying the causal pathways through which work may influence health outcomes, and for designing and testing interventions to improve worker safety and health that are meaningful for workers and employers, and responsive to that setting's conditions of work.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2021
                18 June 2021
                : 11
                : 6
                : e045656
                Affiliations
                [1 ]departmentCenter for Work, Health and Well-being , Harvard University T. H. Chan School of Public Health , Boston, Massachusetts, USA
                [2 ]departmentSurvey and Data Management Core , Dana-Farber Cancer Institute , Boston, Massachusetts, USA
                [3 ]departmentEnvironmental Health , Boston University School of Public Health , Boston, Massachusetts, USA
                [4 ]departmentSocial and Behavioral Sciences , Harvard University T. H. Chan School of Public Health , Boston, Massachusetts, USA
                [5 ]departmentCenter for Community-Based Research , Dana-Farber Cancer Institute , Boston, Massachusetts, USA
                [6 ]departmentOrthopedic Surgery , Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts, USA
                [7 ]departmentHealth Policy and Management , University of Kansas School of Medicine , Kansas City, Kansas, USA
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr María Andrée López Gómez; malopezgomez@ 123456mun.ca
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9779-207X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8195-1355
                Article
                bmjopen-2020-045656
                10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045656
                8215260
                34145013
                1abbb3a3-aeef-492a-8fcf-6724d505f17d
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:  http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 07 October 2020
                : 27 May 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000125, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health;
                Award ID: U19 OH008861
                Categories
                Occupational and Environmental Medicine
                1506
                1716
                Original research
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Medicine
                organisation of health services,occupational & industrial medicine,statistics & research methods

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content36

                Most referenced authors106