There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Abstract
Neuropsychological research on the neural basis of behaviour generally posits that
brain mechanisms will ultimately suffice to explain all psychologically described
phenomena. This assumption stems from the idea that the brain is made up entirely
of material particles and fields, and that all causal mechanisms relevant to neuroscience
can therefore be formulated solely in terms of properties of these elements. Thus,
terms having intrinsic mentalistic and/or experiential content (e.g. 'feeling', 'knowing'
and 'effort') are not included as primary causal factors. This theoretical restriction
is motivated primarily by ideas about the natural world that have been known to be
fundamentally incorrect for more than three-quarters of a century. Contemporary basic
physical theory differs profoundly from classic physics on the important matter of
how the consciousness of human agents enters into the structure of empirical phenomena.
The new principles contradict the older idea that local mechanical processes alone
can account for the structure of all observed empirical data. Contemporary physical
theory brings directly and irreducibly into the overall causal structure certain psychologically
described choices made by human agents about how they will act. This key development
in basic physical theory is applicable to neuroscience, and it provides neuroscientists
and psychologists with an alternative conceptual framework for describing neural processes.
Indeed, owing to certain structural features of ion channels critical to synaptic
function, contemporary physical theory must in principle be used when analysing human
brain dynamics. The new framework, unlike its classic-physics-based predecessor, is
erected directly upon, and is compatible with, the prevailing principles of physics.
It is able to represent more adequately than classic concepts the neuroplastic mechanisms
relevant to the growing number of empirical studies of the capacity of directed attention
and mental effort to systematically alter brain function.
A fundamental question about the relationship between cognition and emotion concerns the neural substrate underlying emotional self-regulation. To address this issue, brain activation was measured in normal male subjects while they either responded in a normal manner to erotic film excerpts or voluntarily attempted to inhibit the sexual arousal induced by viewing erotic stimuli. Results demonstrated that the sexual arousal experienced, in response to the erotic film excerpts, was associated with activation in "limbic" and paralimbic structures, such as the right amygdala, right anterior temporal pole, and hypothalamus. In addition, the attempted inhibition of the sexual arousal generated by viewing the erotic stimuli was associated with activation of the right superior frontal gyrus and right anterior cingulate gyrus. No activation was found in limbic areas. These findings reinforce the view that emotional self-regulation is normally implemented by a neural circuit comprising various prefrontal regions and subcortical limbic structures. They also suggest that humans have the capacity to influence the electrochemical dynamics of their brains, by voluntarily changing the nature of the mind processes unfolding in the psychological space.
The ability to voluntarily self-regulate negative emotion is essential to a healthy psyche. Indeed, a chronic incapacity to suppress negative emotion might be a key factor in the genesis of depression and anxiety. Regarding the neural underpinnings of emotional self-regulation, a recent functional neuroimaging study carried out by our group has revealed that the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and anterior cingulate cortex are involved in voluntary suppression of sexual arousal. As few things are known, still, with respect to the neural substrate underlying volitional self-regulation of basic emotions, here we used functional magnetic resonance imaging to identify the neural circuitry associated with the voluntary suppression of sadness. Twenty healthy female subjects were scanned during a Sad condition and a Suppression condition. In the Sad condition, subjects were instructed to react normally to sad film excerpts whereas, in the Suppression condition, they were asked to voluntarily suppress any emotional reaction in response to comparable stimuli. Transient sadness was associated with significant loci of activation in the anterior temporal pole and the midbrain, bilaterally, as well as in the left amygdala, left insula, and right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC) (Brodmann area [BA] 47). Correlational analyses carried out between self-report ratings of sadness and regional blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal changes revealed the existence of positive correlations in the right VLPFC (BA 47), bilaterally, as well as in the left insula and the affective division of the left anterior cingulate gyrus (BA 24/32). In the Suppression condition, significant loci of activation were noted in the right DLPFC (BA 9) and the right orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) (BA 11), and positive correlations were found between the self-report ratings of sadness and BOLD signal changes in the right OFC (BA 11) and right DLPFC (BA 9). These results confirm the key role played by the DLPFC in emotional self-regulation. They also indicate that the right DLPFC and right OFC are components of a neural circuit implicated in voluntary suppression of sadness.
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.