4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Optimization of a Laser Ablation‐Single Collector‐Inductively Coupled Plasma‐Mass Spectrometer (Thermo Element 2) for Accurate, Precise, and Efficient Zircon U‐Th‐Pb Geochronology

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Many applications specific to detrital mineral U‐Th‐Pb geochronology in the Earth sciences necessitate large numbers of age observations to be made from samples and require accurate and precise isotope measurements across wide dynamic ranges in elemental concentrations and signal intensities. This implies that the laser system and mass spectrometer cannot be tuned between individual analyses as to optimize measurements based on the isotope composition and concentrations of samples and that intensity matching between the unknowns to be dated and the reference material(s) used for fractionation correction is impossible to ensure. We describe methodologies for optimization of laser ablation‐single collector‐inductively coupled plasma‐mass spectrometer for the accurate determination of initial‐Pb‐corrected (using measured 204Pb) U‐Th‐Pb zircon ages, taking full advantage of the high sensitivity provided by the Thermo Element 2 ICP‐MS instruments fitted with a high‐performance low ultimate vacuum Jet interface. “We describe an approach that corrects for nonlinearity of the detector—the primary obstacle avoided with sample‐specific tuning—as well as element‐ and mass‐dependent fractionation and instrumental drift by using a suite of three zircon reference materials with known isotopic ratios from isotope dilution‐thermal ionization mass spectrometry measurements but with differing U and Pb concentrations.” This approach allows for (experimentally) determining an instrumental fractionation versus ion beam intensity curve used for standard‐sample bracketing, thus taking into consideration an important instrumental variable that is commonly ignored in most applications of U‐Pb dating using laser ablation‐single collector‐inductively coupled plasma‐mass spectrometer. We show that these methodologies yield uncertainties and age offsets typically better than ±2.0% for individual measurements of small (e.g., 10‐μm depth × 20‐μm diameter) volumes of material.

          Key Points

          • This work describes an approach to the optimization of the Element 2 LA‐SC‐ICP‐MS for detrital zircon geochronology; the Element is currently one of the most widely used instruments for U‐Pb

          • Nonlinearity of the secondary electron multiplier within the SC‐ICP‐MS and inaccuracy of the analog conversion factor can be partially overcome thus improving accuracy

          • The accuracy to which Pb and U isotopes can be measured is ostensibly improved using a multiple datum approach which allows for the entire dynamic range of the secondary electron multiplier to be used

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          THREE NATURAL ZIRCON STANDARDS FOR U-TH-PB, LU-HF, TRACE ELEMENT AND REE ANALYSES

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Approximation of terrestrial lead isotope evolution by a two-stage model

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Zircon U–Pb chemical abrasion (“CA-TIMS”) method: Combined annealing and multi-step partial dissolution analysis for improved precision and accuracy of zircon ages

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
                Geochem Geophys Geosyst
                American Geophysical Union (AGU)
                1525-2027
                1525-2027
                October 2018
                October 04 2018
                October 2018
                : 19
                : 10
                : 3689-3705
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Environmental Engineering and Earth Sciences Clemson University Clemson SC USA
                [2 ] Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences University of Rochester Rochester NY USA
                [3 ] Department of Geosciences The University of Arizona Tucson AZ USA
                Article
                10.1029/2018GC007889
                0f4c3f59-b234-47bc-b6de-14ffed119adc
                © 2018

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content38

                Cited by12

                Most referenced authors516