There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Abstract
Purpose : Produce a detailed upper-body sweat map and evaluate changes in gross and
regional sweating rates (RSR) and distribution following heat acclimation (HA). Methods
: Six males (25 ± 4 yrs) completed six consecutive HA days (45°C, 20% rh) requiring
90 minutes intermittent exercise to maintain a 1.4°C rectal temperature (Tre) rise.
Pre- and post-HA upper-body RSR were measured at 55% (Intensity-1; I1) and 75% VO2
max (Intensity-2; I2) using a modified absorbent technique. Results : From day one
to six of HA, work rate increased (n.s.), heart rate, Tre, and skin temperature were
similar, and gross sweat loss (GSL) increased (P < 0.001). During pre and post-HA
experiments, relative workloads were similar (Pre-I1 54 ± 3, Post-I1 57 ± 5%VO2max;
Pre-I2 73 ± 4, Post-I2 76 ± 7%VO2max). Post-HA GSL was significantly higher (Pre 449
± 90 g.m−2 h−1, Post 546 g.m−2 h−1; P < 0.01). Highest RSR were observed on the central
back both pre and post-HA at I1 (pre 854 ± 269 post 1178 ± 402g.m−2 h−1) and I2 (pre
1221 ± 351 post 1772 ± 396 g.m−2 h−1). Absolute RSR increased significantly in 12
(I1) to 14 (I2) of the 17 regions. Ratio data indicated significant post-HA relative
RSR redistribution, with decreased relative contributions to whole-body sweating on
the back, chest staying the same and arms increasing. Conclusions : Hot-dry HA significantly
increased GSL in aerobically trained males at I2. Absolute RSR significantly increased
in I1 and I2, with a preferential relative redistribution towards the periphery of
the upper-body.
This study examined the impact of heat acclimation on improving exercise performance in cool and hot environments. Twelve trained cyclists performed tests of maximal aerobic power (VO2max), time-trial performance, and lactate threshold, in both cool [13°C, 30% relative humidity (RH)] and hot (38°C, 30% RH) environments before and after a 10-day heat acclimation (∼50% VO2max in 40°C) program. The hot and cool condition VO2max and lactate threshold tests were both preceded by either warm (41°C) water or thermoneutral (34°C) water immersion to induce hyperthermia (0.8-1.0°C) or sustain normothermia, respectively. Eight matched control subjects completed the same exercise tests in the same environments before and after 10 days of identical exercise in a cool (13°C) environment. Heat acclimation increased VO2max by 5% in cool (66.8 ± 2.1 vs. 70.2 ± 2.3 ml·kg(-1)·min(-1), P = 0.004) and by 8% in hot (55.1 ± 2.5 vs. 59.6 ± 2.0 ml·kg(-1)·min(-1), P = 0.007) conditions. Heat acclimation improved time-trial performance by 6% in cool (879.8 ± 48.5 vs. 934.7 ± 50.9 kJ, P = 0.005) and by 8% in hot (718.7 ± 42.3 vs. 776.2 ± 50.9 kJ, P = 0.014) conditions. Heat acclimation increased power output at lactate threshold by 5% in cool (3.88 ± 0.82 vs. 4.09 ± 0.76 W/kg, P = 0.002) and by 5% in hot (3.45 ± 0.80 vs. 3.60 ± 0.79 W/kg, P < 0.001) conditions. Heat acclimation increased plasma volume (6.5 ± 1.5%) and maximal cardiac output in cool and hot conditions (9.1 ± 3.4% and 4.5 ± 4.6%, respectively). The control group had no changes in VO2max, time-trial performance, lactate threshold, or any physiological parameters. These data demonstrate that heat acclimation improves aerobic exercise performance in temperate-cool conditions and provide the scientific basis for employing heat acclimation to augment physical training programs.
Exercise performance and capacity are impaired in hot, compared to temperate, conditions. Heat adaptation (HA) is one intervention commonly adopted to reduce this impairment because it may induce beneficial exercise performance and physiological and perceptual adaptations. A number of investigations have been conducted on HA but, due to large methodological differences, the effectiveness of different HA regimens remain unclear.
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.