4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      How do we decide how representative our donors are for public health surveillance?

      1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 1 , 9 , International Society for Blood Transfusion, Transfusion Transmitted Infectious Disease Working Party, Surveillance, Risk Assessment & Policy Sub‐group
      Transfusion
      Wiley

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Estimated US Infection- and Vaccine-Induced SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence Based on Blood Donations, July 2020-May 2021

          People who have been infected with or vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 have reduced risk of subsequent infection, but the proportion of people in the US with SARS-CoV-2 antibodies from infection or vaccination is uncertain.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Obesity and risk of infection: results from the Danish Blood Donor Study.

            It is well known that obesity complicates the course of several diseases. However, it is unknown whether obesity affects the risk of infection among healthy individuals.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              A Review of Conceptual Approaches and Empirical Evidence on Probability and Nonprobability Sample Survey Research

              There is an ongoing debate in the survey research literature about whether and when probability and nonprobability sample surveys produce accurate estimates of a larger population. Statistical theory provides a justification for confidence in probability sampling as a function of the survey design, whereas inferences based on nonprobability sampling are entirely dependent on models for validity. This article reviews the current debate about probability and nonprobability sample surveys. We describe the conditions under which nonprobability sample surveys may provide accurate results in theory and discuss empirical evidence on which types of samples produce the highest accuracy in practice. From these theoretical and empirical considerations, we derive best-practice recommendations and outline paths for future research.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Transfusion
                Transfusion
                Wiley
                0041-1132
                1537-2995
                December 2022
                October 04 2022
                December 2022
                : 62
                : 12
                : 2431-2437
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Canadian Blood Services Ottawa Ontario Canada
                [2 ]School of Epidemiology & Public Health University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario Canada
                [3 ]Canadian Blood Services Edmonton Alberta Canada
                [4 ]Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada
                [5 ]Héma‐Québec Montreal Quebec Canada
                [6 ]Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences University of Sherbrooke Sherbrooke Quebec Canada
                [7 ]School of Population and Global Health McGill University Montreal Quebec Canada
                [8 ]UK Health Security Agency London UK
                [9 ]Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario Canada
                Article
                10.1111/trf.17140
                36193865
                086b0b70-c774-45a6-9f53-a7b2c1c6e348
                © 2022

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content3,175

                Cited by6

                Most referenced authors318