3,527
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
4 collections
    3
    shares

      UCL Press journals including UCL Open Environment have now moved website.

      You will now find the journal, all publications, reviews and submission information at https://journals.uclpress.co.uk/ucloe

       

      scite_
      0
      0
      0
      0
      Smart Citations
      0
      0
      0
      0
      Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
      View Citations

      See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

      scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Self-Perceived Loneliness and Depression During the COVID-19 Pandemic: a Two-Wave Replication Study

      Preprint
      research-article
      This is not the latest version for this article. If you want to read the latest version, click here.
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            Content

            Author and article information

            Journal
            UCL Open: Environment Preprint
            UCL Press
            8 October 2021
            Affiliations
            [1 ] Department of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Trento, Italy
            [2 ] School of Social Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
            [3 ] Department of Psychology and Human Development, University College London, London, UK
            [4 ] Departments of Criminology, Psychiatry, and Psychology, University of Pennsylvania
            [5 ] Department of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Trento, Italy; School of Social Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore; Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
            Author notes
            Author information
            https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2737-0218
            https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1586-8350
            https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9846-5767
            https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2962-8438
            https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3756-4307
            https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9442-0254
            Article
            10.14324/111.444/000095.v1
            0769d88b-e572-48eb-9a71-23ea1d32cecf

            This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

            History
            : 8 October 2021
            Funding
            UCL Global Engagement Fund 563920.100.177785

            The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available in the repository: http://www.doi.org/10.5522/04/16583861
            Psychology,Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry,Public health
            COVID-19,depression,lockdown,loneliness,global study,machine learning,SARS-CoV-2,Health

            Comments

            Date: 11 February 2022

            Handling Editor: Dr Matthew O. Gribble

            Editorial decision: Request revision. The Handling Editor requested revisions; the article has been returned to the authors to make this revision. Teh Editor notes the following to be addressed:

            • What is the connection between this work and the primary themes of this environmental journal? Please be sure to clearly and properly situate the work within Planetary Health, GeoHealth, One Health, or another environmental health paradigm to contextualize your research on loneliness and depression as connected to an environmental challenge. This journal has primarily environmental audiences.
            • Several of the reviewers raised concerns about methodological rigor, in particular regarding the data analysis approach. The investigators should better justify their approach or, if they agree with the reviewer that the assumptions of their approach are inconsistent with the design of the study, use an alternative approach. The investigators do not necessarily need to adopt the specific statistical test recommended by the reviewer, as there are other options that would also be appropriate, but the choice of data analysis approach should be clearly presented with the key assumptions of that approach and why that is suitable for the study design, data structure, and scientific hypothesis (or parameter) of interest.
            • It may be difficult for the authors to respond to the sample size concerns raised regarding the approach chosen for data analysis; some discussion of what the implications of this sample size limitation may be for results and overall study conclusions would be appropriate. Sensitivity analyses to assess robustness of findings to model assumption violations, interpolation over sparse data, etc. are always welcome.
            2022-02-11 15:33 UTC
            +1

            Date: 12 October 2021

            Handling Editor: Prof Dan Osborn and Dr Matthew O. Gribble

            This article is a preprint article and has not been peer-reviewed. It is under consideration following submission to UCL Open: Environment for open peer review.

            2021-10-13 08:38 UTC
            +1

            Date: 12 October 2021

            Handling Editor: Prof Dan Osborn

            This article is a preprint article and has not been peer-reviewed. It is under consideration following submission to UCL Open: Environment for open peer review.

            2021-10-12 15:19 UTC
            +1

            Date: 12 October 2021

            Handling Editor: Prof Dan Osborn

            This article is a preprint article and has not been peer-reviewed. It is under consideration following submission to UCL Open: Environment for open peer review.

            2021-10-12 15:19 UTC
            +1

            Comment on this article