42
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Bonding strengths of porcelain repair systems with various surface treatments

      ,
      The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Metal porcelain combined surfaces are often involved in the repairing of fractured porcelain fused to metal restoration. This study investigated the effect of surface treatments on the bonding strength of porcelain fused to metal prosthesis repair. Specimens (8 x 4 mm) were fabricated with Biobond II casting alloy and randomly divided into three surface groups: metal, porcelain, and metal-porcelain combined surface. Biobond porcelain system and commercially available porcelain repair systems were tested. The metal surface group was further divided into two subgroups: control and sandblasting treatment (Al2O3, 50 microns, 20 seconds). In the porcelain surface group, there were three subgroups: (1) control, (2) sandblasting, and (3) 9.5% hydrofluoric acid etching for 4 minutes. The metal-porcelain surface combined group was divided into three subgroups: (1) control, (2) sandblasting, and (3) sandblasting and etching. The manufacturer's instructions for repair systems were followed for specimen preparation. Shear bond strengths of 10 specimens for each subgroup were determined with a universal testing machine after storing in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 7 days. The data were analyzed with analysis of variance and Scheffé F-test at the 95% significance level. The Liner-M repair system showed significantly greater strength than the other tested systems on the metal surface with or without sandblasting treatment (p < 0.05). On the porcelain surface, the strengths of sandblasting and etching subgroups ranged from 7.2 to 16.8 MPa, and 6.8 to 16.8 MPa, respectively. There were no significant differences in bond strengths between sandblasting and combined treatment of the metal-porcelain combined surface group (p > 0.05). The results of this study suggest that metal substrates treated with sandblasting and porcelain treated with either hydrofluoric acid or sandblasting can increase repair strength.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
          The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
          Elsevier BV
          00223913
          September 1997
          September 1997
          : 78
          : 3
          : 267-274
          Article
          10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70025-8
          9297643
          01de1c5e-bd08-41ef-8f50-a19151e7b87a
          © 1997

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article

          scite_
          103
          4
          97
          0
          Smart Citations
          103
          4
          97
          0
          Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
          View Citations

          See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

          scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

          Similar content2,144

          Cited by13